Abstract Ferroptosis induction through the suppression of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and apoptosis-inducing factor mitochondria-associated 2 (AIFM2) has proven to be an effective approach in eliminating chemotherapy-resistant cells of various types. However, a comprehensive understanding of the roles of GPX4 and AIFM2 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has not yet been achieved. Using cBioPortal, DepMap, GEPIA, Metascape, and ONCOMINE, we compared the transcriptional expression, survival data, gene mutation, methylation, and network analyses of GPX4- and AIFM2-associated signaling pathways in AML. The results revealed that high expression levels of GPX4 and AIFM2 are associated with an adverse prognosis for AML patients. Overexpression of AIFM2 correlated with elevated mutation frequencies in NPM1 and DNMT3A. GPX4 upregulation modulated the following pathways: GO:0045333, cellular respiration; R-HSA-5389840, mitochondrial translation elongation; GO:0009060, aerobic respiration; R-HSA-9609507, protein localization; and R-HSA-8953854, metabolism of RNA. On the other hand, the overexpression of AIFM2 influenced the following processes: GO:0048704, embryonic skeletal system morphogenesis; GO:0021546, rhombomere development; GO:0009954, proximal/distal pattern formation; and GO:0048732, gland development. This study identifies the high expression of GPX4 and AIFM2 as novel biomarkers predicting a poor prognosis for AML patients. Furthermore, ferroptosis induction may improve the stratified treatment of AML. Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia, ferroptosis, glutathione peroxidases 4, apoptosis-inducing factor mitochondria-associated 2, chemotherapy resistant INTRODUCTION Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) comprises a group of heterogeneous hematologic malignancies characterized by an increased number of cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities, imposing a profound burden on affected individuals worldwide [[44]1, [45]2]. Despite advancements in AML treatment, such as risk stratification, combination chemotherapy, and stem cell transplantation, the overall survival rate remains unsatisfactory [[46]3, [47]4]. While the genomic landscape of AML has been extensively characterized, revealing numerous potential therapeutic targets, but how to effectively kill AML cells while leaving healthy cells uninjured remains a fundamental challenge. Ferroptosis induction, an iron-dependent form of necrotic cell death triggered by excessive peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), is being explored as an alternative approach to eradicate apoptosis-resistant cancer cells [[48]5, [49]6]. Ferroptosis is identified with hallmarks that are distinct from those of apoptosis; it is characterized by excessive iron-catalyzed peroxidation of PUFA-containing phospholipids (PLs) and is extensive in the mammalian cell membrane [[50]7–[51]9]. PL peroxidation is primarily mediated by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the activity of the lipoxygenase (LOX) family. Failure to initiate protective mechanisms against peroxidation-induced membrane rupture leads to the induction of ferroptosis [[52]10, [53]11]. Consequently, ferroptosis is associated with a series of metabolic disorders, including those involving ROS, iron, and PLs. Abnormal genes and pathways related to the metabolism of iron, energy, oxidative stress, and lipid peroxidation may potentially modify cell sensitivity to ferroptosis. Phospholipid (PL) detoxification is typically regulated by the glutathione peroxidase (GPX) family [[54]12]. To date, GPX4 stands out as the sole GPX responsible for safeguarding membranes against peroxidative damage, and GPX4 functions in a glutathione (GSH)-dependent manner to reduce lipid hydroperoxide levels [[55]13, [56]14]. Depletion of intracellular GSH or the inhibition of GSH synthesis can indirectly deactivate GPX4, leading to the induction of ferroptosis [[57]15]. Beyond GPX4, ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1), also known as apoptosis-inducing factor mitochondria-associated 2 (AIFM2), has recently been identified as another player in suppressing ferroptosis, particularly in the context of GPX4 knockout. AIFM2 protects against ferroptosis through a glutathione-independent mechanism mediated by ubiquinone (CoQ[10]). This compound neutralizes lipid peroxyl radicals, moderating PL peroxidation. AIFM2 catalyzes the production of CoQ[10] via NAD(P)H. Therefore, the AIFM2-CoQ[10]-NAD(P)H pathway constitutes a parallel system that coordinates with GPX4 and glutathione to maintain the homeostasis of phospholipid peroxidation and ferroptosis [[58]16]. Studies have demonstrated that inducing ferroptosis may effectively eliminate chemotherapy-resistant cancer cells in ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer, highlighting the potential of ferroptosis induction as a novel anticancer therapy [[59]17, [60]18]. Consequently, various ferroptosis inducers (FIs) have gained approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical use [[61]19]. However, the evaluation of the ferroptosis landscape has not been conducted in the context of AML. In this study, we utilized widely accepted public databases to assess ferroptosis resistance in AML, revealing a relationship between ferroptosis regulatory genes and the pathogenesis and progression of AML. RESULTS Transcriptional levels of GPX4 and AIFM2 in patients with AML GPX4 and AIFM2 are genes identified in the human genome. To compare their transcriptional levels in cancer and normal controls, we utilized the ONCOMINE database ([62]Figure 1). ONCOMINE analysis revealed an upregulation of GPX4 and AIFM2 mRNA expression in patients with AML ([63]Table 1). Specifically, GPX4 showed upregulation in 3 datasets, while AIFM2 was overexpressed in 1 dataset. Haferlach’s research indicated a 1.334-fold increase in GPX4 mRNA in AML [[64]20]. Andersson and colleagues reported a 1.74-fold elevation of GPX4 in AML [[65]21], and Valk identified GPX4 with a fold change of 1.257 in AML [[66]22]. Regarding AIFM2 mRNA expression, Haferlach found a 1.069-fold increase in AML [[67]20]. Figure 1. Figure 1 [68]Open in a new tab The transcription levels of GPX4 and AIFM2 in different types of cancers. Table 1. The significant changes of GPX4 and AIFM2 expression in transcription level between different types of leukemia and normal control. GENE Type of leukemia versus normal samples Fold change P value T test References