Abstract Background Diseases are often caused by multiple factors, angiogenesis-related genes (ARGs) have been shown to be associated with cancer, however, their role in colon cancer had not been fully explored. This study investigated potential biomarkers based on ARGs to improve prognosis and treatment effect in colon cancer. Methods ARGs associated with colon cancer prognosis were identified using Cox regression analysis and LASSO analysis. Furthermore, a prognostic model was constructed in colon cancer based on the 3 ARGs, and its biological function were analyzed. We evaluated the differences in tumor immune microenvironment based on prognostic signature. Finally, cell experiments confirmed the function of genes in colon cancer. Results The prognostic value of ARGs in colon cancer patients has been comprehensively analyzed for the first time and identified 3 ARGs with prognostic values. A prognosis risk model was constructed based on 3 ARGs and its prognostic value was validated on an independent external colon cancer dataset. In colon cancer patients, this prognostic feature was an independent risk factor and was significantly correlated with clinical feature information of colon cancer patients. This feature was also related to the immune microenvironment of colon cancer. Cell experiments showed that high expression of TNF Receptor Superfamily Member 1B (TNFRSF1B) significantly promoted apoptosis and inhibited proliferation of colon cancer cells. Therefore, TNFRSF1B may become an important regulatory factor in the progression of colon cancer by participating in intracellular functional regulation. Conclusions This study constructed a prognostic risk model based on three ARGs and for the first time discovered that TNFRSF1B may become an important regulatory factor in cancer progression by participating in intracellular functional regulation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12672-025-01835-6. Keywords: Colon cancer, Angiogenesis, TNFRSF1B, Prognosis, Immune Introduction Colon cancer was a common malignant tumor of the digestive tract that occurs in the colon, ranking third among gastrointestinal tumors [[34]1]. The common sites of occurrence are the rectum and the junction between the rectum and the sigmoid colon [[35]2]. Many early colon cancer patients may have no symptoms in clinical practice, but as the disease progresses and the lesions continue to grow, a series of common symptoms of colon cancer can occur, such as increased frequency of bowel movements, bloody and mucous stools, abdominal pain, diarrhea or constipation, intestinal obstruction, as well as general fatigue, weight loss, and anemia [[36]3]. In recent years, chemotherapy and immunotherapy have further improved the prognosis of colon cancer. However, only a small percentage of colon cancer patients will respond well to this therapy [[37]4]. Finding novel indicators to forecast patient survival and responsiveness to immunotherapies and targeted medicines was therefore urgently needed. Angiogenesis was a process of generating new blood vessels and lymphatic vessels based on the existing vascular system of the body's tissues [[38]5]. This process plays an important role in the body's functions such as wound healing and embryonic development [[39]6]. The dynamic balance between proangiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors was disrupted in the tumor tissue microenvironment, shifting towards the direction of promoting angiogenesis [[40]7]. This mechanism of neovascularization in tumor tissue was known as the "angiogenesis effect" of tumors [[41]8]. Angiogenesis was a complex process involving multiple molecules and cells [[42]9]. Angiogenesis was a necessary process for the repair and growth of normal tissue damage, and it was crucial for various processes including tumor growth, organ growth, and wound healing. Although angiogenesis was beneficial for tissue growth and regeneration, the structure formed by angiogenesis in pathological states of diseases was usually functionally abnormal, which can promote malignant diseases and inflammation, and be utilized by tumor cells to kill and metastasize cancer patients [[43]10]. Angiogenesis involves a large number of disease state processes. Anti- angiogenesis has become one of the important strategies for the treatment of tumors and other diseases [[44]11]. Angiogenesis-related genes (ARGs) have been previously demonstrated to have therapeutic potential in various cancers [[45]12]. However, the role of these ARGs in colon cancer was not fully understood. This study analyzed the differential expression of ARGs in colon cancer patients. Then construct a prognostic model for colon cancer patients. Finally, cell experiments showed that high expression of TNF Receptor Superfamily Member 1B (TNFRSF1B) significantly promoted apoptosis and inhibited proliferation of colon cancer cells. Materials and methods Colon cancer dataset preprocessing Two independent datasets ([46]GSE39582 and [47]GSE38832), containing 684 colon cancer samples. The enrollment criteria for the prognostic model were as follows: datasets containing 684 colon cancer samples, series presented with OS time and survival status, and transcriptome profiling as the experiment type. The GEO dataset can be downloaded from the Gene Expression Comprehensive Database (GEO). [48]GSE39582 was used as the training set, while [49]GSE38832 was used as the validation set for subsequent analysis. The raw data processing of microarrays and the evaluation of gene expression levels were carried out using the R 4.2.1 tool [[50]13]. Identification of ARGs with potential prognostic value in colon cancer patients The surve_cutpoint function in R package “surviminer” was used to calculate the optional cutoff value of ARGs in all samples, and the samples were classified into high- and low-expression groups accordingly. Univariate, LASSO, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied to identify the most significant ARGs to build a prognostic model. Univariate Cox regression analysis was then performed to identified genes linked to survival in [51]GSE39582 dataset, validated using [52]GSE38832 dataset. ARGs were considered significant when the p-value was < 0.05 in univariate Cox regression analysis. Overlapping molecules of genes associated with survival and ARGs were considered candidates. The prognosis of the selected candidates was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier curves followed by log-rank tests through the “survminer” package. Subsequently, we used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) of the "glmnet" software-penalized Cox regression to filter out less relevant factors., and ten-fold crossover was used to validate the ideal values for determining penalty parameters. Finally, multivariate Cox regression analysis was applied to optimize the model [[53]13, [54]14]. Consensus clustering analysis of survival related ARGs Furthermore, we performed consensus clustering of the selected genes to investigate their function and prognostic value in colon cancer using the parameters as follows: k = 10 and 1000 repeats. Then the "ggplot2" package was used for principal component analysis (PCA) to confirm the number of clusters, and Kaplan Meier curves were plotted to confirm the different subtypes’ prognostic value in colon cancer patients after clustering classification [[55]15]. A ARGs prognostic model constructed and validated Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the coefficients of ARGs, and the risk scores for prognostic signature of patients were constructed based on the coefficients. The detailed formula was as follows: Risk score = β1 * Exp1 + β2 * Exp2 + β, where Exp and β represent expression levels and coefficients of selected ARGs, respectively. Patients were classified into high- and low-risk subtypes according to the median risk scores. Kaplan–Meier analysis followed by log-rank tests was employed for prognostic analysis using the “survminer” package [[56]16]. Pathway enrichment analysis Genes with correlation coefficients | R |> 0.3 obtained from spearman correlation analysis were considered to be significantly correlated with risk scores. The clusterProfiler package was used to perform Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) functional analysis and Gene Ontology (GO) functional analysis on these genes significantly correlated with risk scores. Normalized P-value < 0.05 and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.2 were the thresholds for selecting differential pathways [[57]17]. Differences in tumor immune microenvironment among different risk groups The CIBERSORT software package was used to analyze the infiltration of 22 immune cells in colon cancer tissues in the [58]GSE39582 dataset. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the differences in immune cell infiltration between colon cancer tissues of different risk groups. Finally, we analyzed the Spearman relationship between immune cells and 3 ARGs and plotted a network diagram. By the pheatmap packages and ggplot2 of the R software, the results were visualized. P < 0.05 was considered significant [[59]18]. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ns P ≥ 0.05. Estimation of therapeutic drugs The oncoPredict software package was used to predict colon cancer drug activity and evaluate the differences in drug activity among low-risk score group and high-risk score group [[60]19]. Construction of TNFRSF1B overexpression colon cancer cell model HTC116 cells were sourced from the cell bank of The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University in Anhui Province. HTC116 cells were cell lines of colon cancer. HTC116 cells were inoculated in DMEM medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (containing 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin) and cultured at 37 ℃ in 5% CO^2 incubator. When the adherent parietal cell grows into a compact monolayer, it is subcultured. Partial stably growing colon cancer cells were randomly divided into two groups: the empty control group (HTC116 + OE-NC) and the TNFRSF1B overexpression group (HTC116 + OE-TNFRSF1B). The TNFRSF1B overexpression plasmid vector and the nonsense sequence TNFRSF1B plasmid vector were transfected into colon cancer cells, respectively. In addition, Quantitative Real-time PCR (qPCR) was used to verify the overexpression effect of TNFRSF1B in HTC116 + OE-NC group cells and HTC116 + OE-TNFRSF1B group cells. Student’s t-test (unpaired) was used to check the statistical significance while comparing the means of two groups, each group has three replicates. P < 0.05 was considered significant [[61]20]. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ns P ≥ 0.05. Colon cancer apoptosis experiment Pre-cooled PBS was used to wash the collected HTC116 cells (HTC116 + OE-NC group cells and HTC116 + OE-TNFRSF1B group cells) (1 × 10^6 cells/time). Then, The cells were resuspended by 1 ml of 1X binding buffer, and after reaching a density of 1 × 10^6 cells/ml in the test tube, in the dark and at room temperature conditions, 5 μL Annexin V-FITC was added to the test tube and gently mixed for 10 min. Finally, 5 μL propidine iodide was added to the test tube and incubated in the dark for 5 min before being detected within 1 h by flow cytometry. After counting total cells and apoptotic cells, we analyzed three independent repeated data and plotted them. Student’s t-test (unpaired) was used to check the statistical significance while comparing the means of two groups. P < 0.05 was considered significant [[62]21]. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ns P ≥ 0.05. Colon cancer cell cycle experiment Transfer HTC116 cells (HTC116 + OE-NC group cells and HTC116 + OE-TNFRSF1B group cells) and culture medium into centrifuge tubes. After centrifugation at 4 °C for 5 min (1000 rpm), remove the supernatant from the centrifuge tube. Then, pre-cooled 75% alcohol was added to the centrifuge tube to fix and resuspend the cells, and place the centrifuge tube in a refrigerator at 4 °C overnight to secure it. After centrifugation at 4 °C for 5 min (1000 rpm), remove the supernatant from the centrifuge tube. Finally, propidine iodide staining solution was added to the centrifuge tube, stain in the dark at 37 °C for 30 min, and then perform flow cytometry detection. We analyzed three independent repeated data and plotted them, Student’s t-test (unpaired) was used to check the statistical significance while comparing the means of two groups. P < 0.05 was considered significant. P < 0.05 was considered significant [[63]22]. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ns P ≥ 0.05. Statistical analysis The Wilcoxon rank sum test and Student t-test were utilized to compare two groups and the Kruskal–Wallis test to compare multiple groups. Univariate, LASSO, and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied to identify the most significant ARGs to build a prognostic model. ARGs were considered significant when the p-value was < 0.05 in univariate Cox regression analysis. Subsequently, LASSO-penalized Cox regression was used to filter out less relevant factors. Finally, multivariate Cox regression analysis was applied to optimize the model. The surve_cutpoint function in R package “surviminer” was used to calculate the optional cutoff value of per gene in all samples. Kaplan Meier method was used for log-rank test and survival analysis. The Spearman analysis method was used for correlation analysis. P < 0.05 was considered significant [[64]13]. Results Identification of ARGs with potential prognostic value in colon cancer patients Based on [65]GSE39582 dataset, a total of 3 ARGs (CD36 [hazard ratio (HR): 1.36, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.20–1.54], ERAP1 [HR: 0.77, 95%CI 0.66–0.91] and TNFRSF1B [HR: 0.63, 95%CI 0.48–0.83]) were associated with prognosis significantly in colon cancer patients and validated them in the [66]GSE38832 dataset (Figures S1, S2). the Kaplan–Meier curves confirmed 3 AGRs (CD36, ERAP1 and TNFRSF1B) s's prognostic value (Fig. [67]1A-B), P < 0.05 were considered significant. In colon cancer, high expression of CD36 had a poor prognosis, while high expression of these genes (ERAP1 and TNFRSF1B) had a better prognosis. Fig. 1. [68]Fig. 1 [69]Open in a new tab Survival analysis for 3 ARGs. A The Kaplan–Meier curves for the 3 ARGs in colon cancer from the [70]GSE39582 dataset; B The Kaplan–Meier curves for the 3 ARGs in colon cancer from [71]GSE38832 dataset. P < 0.05 were considered significant Consensus clustering analysis of prognostic survival related ARGs The consensus clustering analysis results indicate that k = 2 seems to be more stable than k = 3–6 (Fig. [72]2A-B). PCA was further used to verify the reliability of the clustering analysis results, which showed that when k = 2, the samples showed clustered together and high similarity (Figure S3). Thus, we stratified the colon cancer patients into 2 clusters. Colon cancer patients in cluster 2 had a better prognosis than cluster 1 (Fig. [73]2C). Fig. 2. [74]Fig. 2 [75]Open in a new tab A ARGs prognostic model constructed and validated. A The cumulative distribution function of consensus clustering from k = 2–6; B The relative change in area under the CDF curve from k = 2–6; C Colon cancer patients in cluster 2 had a better prognosis than cluster 1 A ARGs prognostic model constructed and validated Risk scores for prognostic signature of colon cancer patients were constructed based on the coefficients and expression levels of 3 ARGs. The detailed formula was shown below: risk score = (0.2085*CD36) + (− 0.2166*ERAP1) + (− 0.4180*TNFRSF1B). Based on the median risk score of prognostic characteristics of colon cancer patients, colon cancer patients were divided into different risk groups (low-risk group and high-risk group), Kaplan–Meier curves showed that colon cancer patients with high-risk had worse prognosis compared with those with low-risk (Fig. [76]3A). The prognostic characteristics were then validated in [77]GSE38832 dataset, showing the similar result of [78]GSE39582 dataset (Figure S4). These analysis results demonstrate the stability and reliability of the prognostic features of colon cancer, and the risk score was identified as an independent risk factor for the prognosis of colon cancer patients by multivariate Cox regression analysis (Fig. [79]3B). These results demonstrate the reliability and stability of the prognostic characteristics. Dividing patients into subgroups based on clinical variables, we found that colon cancer patients with pM, pT, TNM and MMR had different risk scores (Fig. [80]3C). Fig. 3. [81]Fig. 3 [82]Open in a new tab Relationship between the prognostic model and clinical pathological factors of colon cancer patients. A Kaplan–Meier curves showed that patients with high-risk had worse prognosis compared with those with low-risk; B These analysis results demonstrate the stability and reliability of the prognostic features of colon cancer; C Dividing patients into subgroups based on clinical variables, we found that colon cancer patients with pM, pT, TNM and MMR had different risk scores Identification of the prognostic model-related biological pathways 246 significantly negatively correlated genes and 62 significantly positively correlated genes were selected. The results of the KEGG pathways and GO are shown in Figure S5. The GO functional analysis results were mainly enriched in nuclear division, while KEGG functional analysis results were mainly enriched in Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis. Differences in tumor immune microenvironment among different risk groups and its relationship with drug activity The plots show a significant difference in immune cell infiltration between low-risk patients and high-risk patients and the differences in various immune cells' proportions are complex (Fig. [83]4A-B). 3 ARGs were significantly associated with immune cells in colon cancer (Fig. [84]4C-D). Using the oncoPredict software package in R, we evaluated and calculated 198 drugs' drug sensitivity in colon cancer. We identified 6 drugs with significant differences in IC50 between the low-risk and high-risk groups (Cytarabine, AZD7762, PD0325901, Bortezomib, Dihydrorotenone, BMS.754807) (Figure S6). Fig. 4. [85]Fig. 4 [86]Open in a new tab The relationship between tumor immune microenvironment. A-B The plots show a significant difference in immune cell infiltration between low-risk patients and high-risk patients and the differences in various immune cells' proportions are complex; C-D 3 ARGs associated with immune cells, which may have an impact on patient prognosis. P < 0.05 was considered significant. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ns P ≥ 0.05 Construction of TNFRSF1B overexpression HTC116 cell model The qPCR results showed that compared with the control group, the cells transfected with HTC116 + OE-TNFRSF1B had the significant overexpression effect on TNFRSF1B and named HTC116 + OE-TNFRSF1B (Figure S7). Colon cancer apoptosis experiment Cell apoptosis' results showed that compared with the control group (HTC116 + OE-NC) cells, the colon cancer apoptosis rate of the HTC116 + OE-TNFRSF1B group colon cancer cells were significantly increased (Fig. [87]5A-B). Fig. 5. [88]Fig. 5 [89]Open in a new tab Colon cancer apoptosis experiment. Cell apoptosis' results showed that compared with the control group (HTC116 + OE-NC) cells, the colon cancer apoptosis rate of the HTC116 + OE-TNFRSF1B group colon cancer cells were significantly increased (A-B). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ns P ≥ 0.05 Colon cancer cell cycle experiment Cell cycle's results showed that compared with the control group (HTC116 + OE-NC) cells, the HTC116 + OE-TNFRSF1B group showed significant inhibition of colon cancer cells in the G1 phase (Fig. [90]6A-B). Fig. 6. [91]Fig. 6 [92]Open in a new tab Colon cancer cell cycle experiment. Cell cycle's results showed that compared with the control group (HTC116 + OE-NC) cells, the HTC116 + OE-TNFRSF1B group showed significant inhibition of colon cancer cells in the G1 phase (A-B). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ns P ≥ 0.05 Discussion At present, the advancement of medical technology had improved the prognosis of colon cancer patients. However, most colon cancer patients face the risk of drug resistance and recurrence during treatment [[93]23]. Therefore, there was an urgent need to find new therapeutic targets and prognostic indicators in clinical practice to improve the prognosis and survival rate of colon cancer patients [[94]24]. ARGs had been reported to play a crucial role in the occurrence and development of various cancers, however, their function in colon cancer had not been fully explored [[95]25]. In this research, we systematically evaluated the role of ARGs in colon cancer and selected 3 ARGs with prognostic and potential therapeutic value. Then, new prognostic features of colon cancer patients were first constructed and validated based on these 3 ARGs. We found a significant correlation between the newly constructed prognostic features and the clinical characteristics of colon cancer patients. In addition, the new prognostic features of colon cancer are significantly correlated with the immune microenvironment of colon cancer, which may provide valuable clues for selecting immunotherapy patients and predicting patient prognosis, which may provide a fundamental theoretical basis for improving the diagnosis and treatment of colon cancer in clinical practice. At present, in clinical practice, the prognosis of colon cancer patients is mainly predicted based on their clinical and pathological characteristics, such as tumor size, depth of invasion, etc. [[96]26]. Although pathology played an important role in evaluating the prognosis of diseases such as tumors, its predictive accuracy was still limited. Clinical pathological evaluation usually only focuses on changes at the tissue or cellular level and may not fully consider the overall condition of the patient [[97]27]. Cancer cells originate from normal tissue cells and may be the result of genetic factors leading to certain gene changes [[98]28]. In addition, as our research on cancer mechanisms deepens, gene changes have become increasingly important in the pathology and immune mechanisms of cancer [[99]29]. Therefore, exploring the genetic level of cancer was particularly important. Previous studies had reported that genetic prognostic markers can help doctors assess a patient's disease risk and take more effective prevention and treatment measures [[100]13]. We constructed a prognostic risk model based on 3 ARGs, which was a novel prognostic tool aimed at improving survival prediction for colon cancer patients, and its prognostic value was validated on an independent external colon cancer dataset, demonstrating the stability and reliability of cancer prognostic features and potentially supplementing existing clinical pathological feature methods. However, this study relies on retrospective data, so further prospective cohort validation studies will be our next research direction. Our study found that compared to the low-risk group, the infiltration degree of CD8 + T cells was significantly reduced in the high-risk group. TNFRSF1B was significantly positively correlated with the degree of immune infiltration of CD8 + T cells. CD8 + T cells, as the core of the adaptive immune system, played a role in cancer that not only involves specific recognition and direct killing of tumor cells, but also inhibits tumor growth by regulating the tumor microenvironment [[101]30]. Numerous studies have shown that infiltration of CD8 + T cells into the tumor microenvironment was a favorable prognostic feature for many malignant tumors. CD8 + T cells recognize specific tumor associated antigens expressed on tumor cells, release cytotoxic molecules granzyme B and perforin into tumor cells, induce caspase activation, and ultimately lead to tumor cell apoptosis [[102]31]. Inducing tumor cell apoptosis had always been various tumor immunotherapies' fundamental goal [[103]32]. Colon cancer cells confirmed that expression of TNFRSF1B can significantly promote colon cancer cell apoptosis.Therefore, in colon cancer patients, TNFRSF1B may effectively enhance T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity by promoting immune infiltration of CD8 + T cells, thereby inducing cancer cell apoptosis. However, further research was needed to determine the specific mechanism. In colon cancer, high expression of TNFRSF1B had a better prognosis, based on [104]GSE38832 and [105]GSE39582, TNFRSF1B was an independent prognostic risk factor in colon cancer. The TNFRSF1B gene encodes member 1B of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, which was an important immune regulatory molecule involved in regulating processes such as cell survival, proliferation, and apoptosis [[106]33]. The variation of this gene was associated with various diseases, including cardiovascular disease, autoimmune diseases, and certain cancers [[107]34]. The current research focus was on exploring how the polymorphism of TNFRSF1B gene affects disease susceptibility, disease progression, and response to specific treatments, especially the expression of TNFRSF1B gene and the regulatory mechanism of cellular function, which are the focus of research [[108]35]. In cell experiments, the absence of TNFRSF1B induces regulatory changes in several key pathways related to inflammation, apoptosis, and cell proliferation [[109]36]. TNFRSF1B may therefore become an important regulatory factor in colon cancer's progression by participating in intracellular functional regulation. The colon cancer cell experiment confirmed that the gene expression of TNFRSF1B can significantly inhibit the cell cycle progression of colon cancer cells and significantly promote apoptosis of colon cancer cells. Therefore, TNFRSF1B was a potential therapeutic target for colon cancer. This study inevitably had several limitations. The dataset for this study was from a public database, which were retrospective and had potential confounding factors. Prospective cohort studies were needed for further exploration. The expression levels of ARGs may be influenced by clinical parameters, and the clinical information data available to colon cancer patients in this study is limited. Therefore, the expression levels of ARGs in some cancer patients may not be accurate. Our study only used one colon cancer cell line for research, and the experimental results of a single cancer cell line may have limitations and cannot fully reflect the heterogeneity and complexity of cancer cells. In order to gain a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the biological characteristics of genes in cancer cells, biological experiments on multiple cancer cell lines will be one of our next research goals. In addition, in vitro cell experiments do not involve the regulation of the neuroendocrine system or interactions between cells in vivo, and the characteristics of cell-derived tissues cannot be fully represented by in vitro experiments. Therefore, further animal experiments were necessary. Conclusion In summary, the prognostic value of ARGs in colon cancer patients had been comprehensively analyzed for the first time and identified 3 ARGs with prognostic values. A prognosis risk model was constructed based on 3 ARGs and its prognostic value was validated on an independent external colon cancer dataset. In colon cancer patients, this prognostic feature was an independent risk factor and was significantly correlated with clinical feature information of colon cancer patients. This feature was also related to the immune microenvironment of colon cancer. The high expression of TNFRSF1B can significantly promote cell apoptosis and inhibit the colon cancer cells cycle progression. Therefore, TNFRSF1B may become an important regulatory factor in the progression of colon cancer by participating in intracellular functional regulation. This research provides a fundamental theoretical basis for improving the diagnosis and treatment of colon cancer in clinical practice. Supplementary Information [110]Additional file 1.^ (1.4MB, docx) Author contributions Fei Liu: Conceived and designed the experiments; Fei Liu and Yi Wang: Performed the experiments; Fei Liu and Leiming Xia: Analyzed and interpreted the data; Yunhong Xia: Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Fei Liu, Chen Sun and Yun Li: Wrote the paper. Funding Not applicable. Data availability Gene expression microarray data sets, including [111]GSE38832 and [112]GSE39582, are downloaded from the Gene Expression Integrated Database (GEO)( [113]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/)". Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Footnotes Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. References