Abstract
   This study investigated the impact of steaming on the flavor and
   metabolic profile of Antarctic krill, aiming to elucidate the pathways
   responsible for flavor development and metabolic shifts during
   processing. HS-SPME-GC–MS identified key volatile compounds, including
   alcohols, aldehydes, ketones and so on. The results demonstrated a
   significant increase in nonanal content from 2.23 ± 0.06 μg/kg to
   8.14 ± 1.26 μg/kg after steaming. The formation pathways of two key
   flavor compounds, nonanal and 1-octen-3-ol, were attributed to fatty
   acid degradation. Hierarchical clustering and volcano plot showed
   metabolic shifts between raw and steamed krill, with differential
   metabolites like hydroquinone and gamma-aminobutyric acid emerging as
   key contributors to flavor changes. Furthermore, metabolic network
   further linked these shifts to reactions involving amino acids,
   nucleotide and other compounds during steaming, impacting the overall
   taste.
   Keywords: Steaming, Antarctic krill, Flavor compounds, Formation
   pathway, Untargeted metabolomics
Graphical abstract
   [37]Unlabelled Image
   [38]Open in a new tab
Highlights
     * •
       E-2-octenal, nonanal, 1-octen-3-ol are the key flavor compounds in
       steamed krill.
     * •
       Steaming induces the formation of nonanal, 1-octen-3-ol via fatty
       acid degradation.
     * •
       Lipid degradation and amino acid reactions contribute to the
       development of flavor.
1. Introduction
   Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) has the advantages of large
   biomass, rich nutrition, high protein and low fat ([39]Hamner & Hamner,
   2000), and it is abundant in essential amino acids, as well as DHA and
   EPA, along with other bioactive compounds ([40]Jiang et al., 2024). In
   the waters off the western Antarctic Peninsula, krill make up 75–90 %
   of the total biomass ([41]McBride et al., 2021), with estimates
   suggesting that the krill reserves in this region could reach billions
   of tonnes. Antarctic krill has broad application prospects and is
   considered a potential future food source. Currently, Antarctic krill
   products primarily include krill powder, dried krill, and krill oil,
   which are produced through steaming processes ([42]Trathan et al.,
   2021). However, the use of steam in heat processing has significant
   impact on the volatile compounds in meat ([43]Khan et al., 2015).
   The characteristic flavor of Antarctic krill meat was developed through
   chemical reactions such as protein hydrolysis and fat oxidation ([44]Li
   et al., 2022). Similarly, [45]Zhang, Cao, et al. (2019) identified and
   quantified the characteristic flavor compounds in golden pomfret
   fillets, analyzing the generation of volatile flavor compounds from the
   perspectives of Strecker degradation, protein hydrolysis, and lipid
   oxidative degradation. In another study, [46]Mall and Schieberle (2016)
   used aroma extract dilution analysis to identify the primary aroma
   compounds in raw and cooked shrimp, revealing that different heat
   treatments caused variations in the types and quantities of aroma
   compounds in shrimp meat. While the qualitative analysis of flavor
   substances and the quantitative analysis of key volatile compounds in
   food have become well-established, there is a lack of research into the
   interactions between these flavor compounds and their formation
   mechanisms.
   The flavor is a key factor that influences people's preference for
   food. Previous studies have investigated the volatile flavor compounds
   and the impact of heat treatment on the flavor profile of Antarctic
   krill. [47]Fan et al. (2017) used HS-SPME and GC–MS to analyze the
   volatile flavor compounds in Antarctic krill, detecting a total of 42
   volatile substances responsible for its unique flavor. Of these, seven
   compounds made significant contributions to the flavor profile of
   Antarctic krill. [48]Bai et al. (2022) conducted sensory evaluations
   along with electronic tongue and nose analyses, as well as GC–MS, to
   compare the flavor of Antarctic krill and white shrimp, showing notable
   changes in the characteristic flavor compounds after steaming and
   boiling. Additionally, [49]Zhang et al. (2018) investigated the effects
   of different heating methods on the content of six non-volatile
   reactive compounds (NRCs) in Antarctic krill and Pacific white shrimp,
   demonstrating that adjusting heating conditions effectively controlled
   the NRC levels.
   However, researchers have primarily focused on the qualitative and
   quantitative assessments of individual flavor compounds when studying
   the flavor of steamed aquatic products, lacking a comprehensive
   characterization of the multiple factors influencing flavor ([50]Zhang,
   Ma, & Dai, 2019). Additionally, research on the interactions between
   flavor components and the formation mechanisms of key compounds remains
   limited ([51]Liang et al., 2022). Currently, the effects of steaming on
   the flavor quality of Antarctic krill are not well understood, and the
   mechanisms of flavor formation require further investigation.
   Therefore, it is essential to explore the processes and mechanisms
   responsible for the characteristic flavor of steamed Antarctic krill.
   The present study aims to elucidate the formation pathway of key flavor
   compounds during processing. The untargeted metabolomics approach was
   employed to analyze the alterations of typical flavor compounds in
   Antarctic krill pre- and post- steaming, thereby establishing a
   foundation for quality control measures pertaining to Antarctic krill.
   These results will establish a theoretical foundation for comprehending
   the metabolic alterations and formation pathways of flavor compounds.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials and reagents
   Antarctic krill was supplied with the China National Aquatic Products
   Corporation (Zhoushan, Zhejiang, China). All reagents are analytical
   grade.
2.2. Preparation of taste extracts from Antarctic krill
   The thawed Antarctic krill meat was homogenized with ultrapure water at
   a ratio of 1:10 (w/v) and then centrifuged at 9000 rpm for 20 min at
   4 °C. The resulting supernatant of raw Antarctic krill meat (RKM) was
   collected as the taste extract. For the steamed samples, raw krill was
   steamed for 5 min. The preparation of the natural flavor extract from
   steamed krill meat (SKM) followed the same procedure as for the raw
   krill meat.
2.3. GC–MS analysis of volatile flavor compounds
   The volatile compounds of Antarctic krill meat were extracted using
   HS-SPME ([52]Fan et al., 2017). The minced SKM or RKM samples (3.0 g),
   along with 3 mL saturated NaCl solution and 2, 4, 6-trimethylpridine
   were introduced into a 20 mL headspace bottle, respectively. An SPME
   fiber (65 μm, PDMS/DVB, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was inserted into
   the headspace of the vial and extracted for 45 min at 65 °C. The fiber
   was transferred to an injection port and desorbed for 5 min at 250 °C.
   The volatile flavor compounds in SKM or RKM samples were identified
   using GC–MS (7000 D, Agilent Technologies Inc., USA) with an HP-5MS
   capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm). The heating program was as
   follows: the initial oven temperature was set at 40 °C for 3 min, then
   increased to 250 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min, and held at 250 °C for
   5 min. The sample was introduced into the GC at a flow rate of
   1.0 mL/min using helium (99.999 %), with an injector temperature of
   250 °C. The detector temperature was set at 250 °C, with a mass range
   of 35–350 m/z.
   The identification of volatile flavor compounds by GC–MS was performed
   by searching the NIST20 mass spectrometry database. N-Alkanes (C8-C30)
   were employed to calculate linear retention indices of volatile
   compounds. The content of volatile compounds was calculated according
   to the method of [53]Kaseleht et al. (2011). In brief, each sample was
   spiked with 0.0465 μg of the internal standard 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine,
   and the compounds were relatively quantified based on the content and
   peak area of the internal standard.
2.4. Evaluation of odor activity values (OAV) of volatile compounds
   OAV is employed to evaluate the contribution of a volatile flavor
   compound to the overall flavor profile of a sample. The OAV is
   calculated using the following formula:
   [MATH: OAV=C/OT :MATH]
   where OAV represents the odor activity value; C denotes the content of
   the volatile compound detected in the sample (μg/kg); OT refers to the
   literature-based odor threshold of this compound (μg/kg).
2.5. Fatty acids analysis using GC–MS
   Antarctic krill meat (15 g) was combined with 200 mL of chloroform and
   100 mL of methanol, then stirred thoroughly and placed at 4 °C
   overnight. The filtrate was collected and mixed with 0.9 % sodium
   chloride solution (5:1, v/v). After standing for 12 h, the lower
   organic phase was dried. The dried sample (20 g) were combined with
   2 mL of 10 % concentrated sulfuric acid in methanol and reacted at
   60 °C for 15 min. The cooled samples were then mixed with 2 mL of
   n-hexane, and the upper solution was filtered through a non-polar
   0.22 μm filter after standing for 10 min.
   The fatty acid composition of raw and steamed krill meat was analyzed
   using GC–MS (7000 D, Agilent Technologies Inc., USA) with an HP-INNOWAX
   quartz capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm) following the method
   of [54]Valasi et al. (2021). The sample was introduced into the GC with
   helium at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The heating program was as
   follows: the initial oven temperature was set at 120 °C, then increased
   to 210 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min and maintained at 210 °C for 10 min.
   The mass spectrometer operated in electron ionization mode with a mass
   scan range of 50 to 500 m/z in full-scan mode. The electron energy was
   set at 70 eV, with the ion source temperature at 230 °C and the
   quadrupole temperature at 250 °C.
2.6. Analysis of peptides in krill taste extract
   The Antarctic krill meat (6 g) was homogenized with a solid-liquid
   ratio of 1:4, and then centrifuged at 9000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The
   resulting supernatant was mixed with acetonitrile to precipitate
   macromolecular proteins. After centrifugation, the supernatant was
   obtained and then freeze-dried. The resulting powder was dissolved
   (10 mg/mL), desalted, and then analyzed by an ultra-performance liquid
   chromatography (Dionex UltiMate 3000, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.,
   Waltham, USA) coupled with a quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Q
   Exactive, Thermo Fisher, USA).
   The separation conditions for UHPLC were as follows: Mobile phase A
   consisted of 0.1 % formic acid in water, while mobile phase B was 0.1 %
   formic acid in acetonitrile. The analysis was performed using an
   Agilent Advanced Bio Peptide Map C18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 2.7 μm
   particle size). The flow rate was set at 0.25 mL/min with an injection
   volume of 30 μL. The total run time was 46 min, and the column
   temperature was maintained at 40 °C.
   The mass spectrometer operated in electrospray positive ion (ESI+) mode
   with an electrospray voltage of 5500 V. The scanning range for mass
   spectrometry was 300–1500 m/z. The atomization gas pressure was set to
   60 psi, the auxiliary heating air pressure to 50 psi, the air curtain
   pressure to 35 psi, and the ion source temperature was kept at 525 °C.
   The flavor peptides and amino acids were assessed based on the BIOPEP
   database ([55]https://biochemia.uwm.edu.pl/biopep-uwm/), followed by
   the prediction of their flavor characteristics.
2.7. Analysis of amino acid cleavage sites of peptide chain in krill taste
extract
   A 0.2 g portion of the lyophilized sample underwent derivatization
   according to the method of [56]Shi et al. (2013). The derivatized
   sample was then vacuum-dried and dissolved. The solution was incubated
   in a water bath at 54 °C for 45 min and then vacuum-dried. The dried
   sample was dissolved in 80 % ethanol and extracted with n-hexane. The
   lower phase was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter membrane.
   Free amino acids (FAA) were analyzed using HPLC with an Agilent 1260
   Infinity system (Agilent Technologies Co. Ltd., California, USA),
   equipped with a UV-detector. The analysis was conducted using a ZORBAX
   Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm × 5 μm) at 254 nm. Mobile phase A
   consisted of 0.1 mol/L sodium acetate-acetonitrile (97:3, v/v, pH 6.5),
   while mobile phase B was 80 % acetonitrile in water. The samples were
   eluted at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min with the following gradient:
   0–15 min, 95–84 % A; 15–35 min, 84–50 % A; 35–38 min, 50–95 % A;
   38–40 min, 95 % A.
2.8. The approach of non-targeted metabolomics based on LC-MS/MS
2.8.1. Liquid chromatography conditions
   The liquid chromatography analysis was performed using a Vanquish UHPLC
   System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with a method slightly modified
   from [57]Zelena et al. (2009). Chromatography was conducted using an
   ACQUITY UPLC® HSS T3 column (150 × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm) (Waters, Milford,
   MA, USA), with the column temperature set at 40 °C.
   The Antarctic krill sample was mixed with 0.75 mL of
   methanol-chloroform solution (9:1, v/v) and 0.25 mL of water. The
   mixture underwent ball milling homogenization at 50 Hz for 120 s,
   followed by ultrasonication for 30 min and ice bath treatment for an
   additional 30 min. The homogenate was then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at
   4 °C for 10 min. The resulting supernatant was collected and
   concentrated to dryness. Subsequently, 200 μL of
   2-chloro-L-phenylalanine solution (4 ppm in 50 % acetonitrile) was
   added accurately to the dried residue. The mixture was filtered and
   prepared for LC-MS analysis.
2.8.2. Mass spectrum conditions
   Mass spectrometric detection of differential metabolites was done using
   an Orbitrap Exploris 120 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with an ESI
   ion source according to the method of [58]Want et al. (2013). Detection
   was conducted in Full MS-ddMS2 mode (data-dependent MS/MS).
2.8.3. Data analysis
   It was employed for multivariate data analysis and model construction
   ([59]Thévenot et al., 2015). After scaling the data, orthogonal-partial
   least-square discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was used to build the
   models. Metabolic profiles were visualized using score plots, where
   each point represented a sample. Corresponding S-plots were generated
   to highlight the metabolites that influenced the clustering of the
   samples. The P-value, VIP from OPLS-DA, and fold change (FC) were
   applied to identify variables contributing to classification. Finally,
   metabolites with P-value <0.05 and VIP > 1 were considered
   statistically significant.
2.8.4. Pathway analysis
   Differential metabolites were subjected to pathway enrichment analysis
   using MetaboAnalyst, which combines both pathway enrichment and
   topology analyses ([60]Xia & Wishart, 2011).
2.9. Statistical analysis
   All experiments were performed at least three times and the data were
   expressed as the mean value ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis
   was performed using SPSS 19.0 software.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Effects of steaming on the relative content of volatile flavor compounds
in Antarctic krill
   The exquisite flavor of krill meat primarily depends on the composition
   of volatile compounds. In this study, HS-SPME combined with GC–MS was
   used to analyze the types and concentrations of volatile flavor
   compounds in steamed krill. The RKM and SKM samples were detected to
   contain a total of 39 volatile flavor compounds, including alcohols,
   aldehydes, esters, and so on ([61]Table 1). The species and
   concentrations of these volatile compounds differed between SKM and
   RKM. Alcohols and aldehydes were formed through lipid degradation, the
   Maillard reaction, Strecker degradation, and the interaction of their
   metabolites ([62]Al-Dalali et al., 2022).
Table 1.
   Analysis of volatile compounds in Antarctic krill.
   Classification Compounds RI Identifiction Content (μg/kg)
     __________________________________________________________________
   Odor description
   RKM SKM
   Alcohols
   1 2,6-nonadiene-1-ol – MS N 3.03 ± 0.23 green, vegetable
   2 1-octene-3-ol 978 MS, RI N 0.49 ± 0.04 mushroom, green
   3 2-ethyl-1-hexanol 1029 MS, RI N 14.68 ± 4.12 mushroom
   4 2,6-dimethyl cyclohexanol 1108 MS, RI N 1.15 ± 0.03 flower
   5 α-terpineol 1192 MS, RI N 0.40 ± 0.10 flower
   6 5-nondecene-1-ol 1206 MS, RI N 0.80 ± 0.12
   7 phytol 2114 MS, RI N 1.25 ± 0.53 flower
   Aldehydes
   1 E-2-octenal 972 MS, RI 6.09 ± 0.97 3.53 ± 0.21 nutty
   2 phenylacetaldehyde 1043 MS, RI N 2.18 ± 0.65 green, honey
   3 nonanal 1104 MS, RI 2.23 ± 0.06 8.14 ± 1.26 fat, citrus, green
   4 2,4-dimethyl benzaldehyde 1178 MS, RI 0.44 ± 0.09 N almond
   5 hexadecaldehyde 1817 MS, RI N 1.25 ± 0.33 fat
   Ketones
   1 1-phenyl-2-pentanone – MS 0.20 ± 0.01 N
   2 6-methyl-5-heptene-2
   -one 986 MS, RI 4.54 ± 0.43 2.28 ± 0.43 fruity
   3 3-ethyl-4-heptanone 1048 MS, RI N 0.35 ± 0.09
   4 heptanophenone 1065 MS, RI N 0.88 ± 0.02 fruity
   5 acetophenone 1066 MS, RI N 0.89 ± 0.01 sweet, fruity
   6 2,5-hexanedione 1244 MS, RI N 0.29 ± 0.07 smelly
   7 benzophenone 1633 MS, RI N 0.22 ± 0.03 rose, sweet
   Esters
   1 2-methyl-butanoic acid methylester – MS 1.09 ± 0.08 N fruity
   2 methyl acetate 1173 MS, RI N 0.54 ± 0.09 aroma
   3 butyl benzoate 1376 MS, RI N 0.28 ± 0.03 fruity
   4 dibutyl phthalate 1883 MS, RI 3.50 ± 0.30 N
   Hydrocarbons
   1 ethyl benzene 853 MS, RI 26.33 ± 0.48 1.08 ± 0.10 aromatic
   2 α-pinene 930 MS, RI 13.17 ± 0.39 N citrus
   3 γ-terpinene 1008 MS, RI 6.91 ± 0.21 N rosin,resin
   4 D-limonene 1028 MS, RI 17.45 ± 1.08 N orange, lemon
   5 undecane 1099 MS, RI 0.72 ± 0.06 N alkane odor
   6 dodecane 1101 MS, RI 1.00 ± 0.08 N alkane odor
   7 2-methyl-naphthalene 1295 MS, RI N 2.56 ± 0.35 naphthalene odor
   Others
   1 dimethyl disulfide – MS 0.36 ± 0.04 N onion, cabbage
   2 methoxy-phenyl oxime 905 MS, RI 14.27 ± 0.02 18.79 ± 0.59
   3 2-methyl-benzofuran 1199 MS, RI 3.26 ± 0.30 N
   4 benzothiazole 989 MS, RI N 2.52 ± 0.26 caramel
   5 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol 1225 MS, RI N 0.23 ± 0.05 potion
   6 butyl hydroxytoluene 1513 MS, RI 0.38 ± 0.01 0.69 ± 0.05
   7 tetradecanoic acid 1517 MS, RI 0.51 ± 0.09 2.17 ± 0.17
   8 2-pentadecyl furan 1865 MS, RI N 0.20 ± 0.01
   9 N-hexadecanoic acid 1961 MS, RI 1.89 ± 0.06 2.50 ± 0.11
   [63]Open in a new tab
   Note: - indicates not calculated; N means not detected; Odor
   description refers to literature.
   The alcohols produced by steaming in this study predominantly exhibited
   green, floral, and vegetal notes, which may significantly influence the
   flavor profile of Antarctic krill meat ([64]Lorenzo et al., 2013). A
   notable change in alcohol concentrations was observed after steaming.
   As shown in [65]Table 1, seven alcohols were detected in Antarctic
   krill post-steaming, most of which contributed green, vegetal, and
   floral flavors ([66]Xu et al., 2021). Among these, 2,6-nonadien-1-ol
   imparted a green and vegetal fragrance, while α-terpineol provided a
   floral aroma ([67]Xu et al., 2021). 1-Octen-3-ol, with the higher odor
   activity value (OAV) in Antarctic krill, was characterized by a
   mushroom and green aroma and is also considered a key contributor to
   the earthy flavors found in aquatic products. Five aldehydes were
   detected in Antarctic krill, including phenylacetaldehyde and
   hexadecanal, which were found in steamed Antarctic krill, with a
   significant increase in nonanal content. Phenylacetaldehyde imparted
   green and honey-like aromas, while acetaldehyde contributed a fatty
   note, both potentially playing a key role in the flavor profile of
   Antarctic krill meat ([68]Serot et al., 2001). The content of nonanal
   in Antarctic krill increased from 2.23 to 8.14 μg/kg after steaming,
   contributing a fatty aroma. This increase is believed to result from
   the thermal oxidation or degradation of unsaturated fatty acids,
   particularly linoleic or linolenic acids ([69]An et al., 2020; [70]Cao
   et al., 2014).
   Ketones are typically produced through the oxidation of lipids and the
   Strecker degradation of amino acids ([71]Zhang et al., 2020). In total,
   seven ketone compounds were detected in Antarctic krill, contributing
   to the fruity aroma of krill products ([72]Sarnoski et al., 2010).
   Ester compounds, which are esterification products of carboxylic acids
   and alcohols formed during lipid metabolism, play a key role in
   determining the flavor characteristics of Antarctic krill
   ([73]Carrapiso et al., 2002). Steaming led to the formation of methyl
   acetate and butyl benzoate, both with fruity aromas, as well as
   benzothiazole, which imparted a caramel-like flavor.
   The OAV is an important indicator for assessing the overall
   contribution of a single compound to the odor profile of Antarctic
   krill meat ([74]Zhang, Ma, et al., 2019). The impact of volatile
   compounds on the sample's flavor depends not only on their
   concentration but also on their odor threshold value ([75]Zhu et al.,
   2016). Generally, compounds with an OAV greater than 1 are typically
   regarded as active and make a significant contribution to the overall
   flavor of the sample ([76]Hu et al., 2021). As shown in [77]Table 2,
   among the aldehyde compounds, the content of E-2-octenal decreased
   after steaming, but its OAV remained significantly greater than 1. The
   OAV of phenylacetaldehyde and nonanal in SKM were 2.18 and 8.14,
   respectively, indicating that aldehydes played a crucial role in the
   characteristic flavor of Antarctic krill. Overall, E-2-octenal,
   phenylacetaldehyde, and nonanal were identified as key contributors to
   the flavor of steamed Antarctic krill, imparting grassy, citrus, and
   floral notes to SKM ([78]Zhao et al., 2020).
Table 2.
   Odor activity evaluation and odor description of volatile compounds in
   Antarctic krill.
   Classification Compounds Threshold
   (μg/kg)^a OAV
     __________________________________________________________________
   Odor description^b
   RKM SKM
   Alcohols 1-octene-3-ol 1 N 0.49 mushroom, green
   α-terpineol 330 N 0 flower
   Aldehydes E-2-octenal 3 2.03 1.18 nutty
   phenylacetaldehyde 1 N 2.18 green, honey
   nonanal 1 2.23 8.14 fat, citrus, green
   Ketones 6-methyl-5-heptene-2-one 50 0.09 0.05 fruity
   Hydrocarbon D-limonene 10 1.75 N orange, lemon
   [79]Open in a new tab
   Note: N means not detected; a threshold reference; b odor Description:
   refer to previous literature.
3.2. Effects of lipid oxidative degradation on flavor formation in steamed
Antarctic krill
   The lipids in Antarctic krill serve as essential precursors for the
   formation of volatile flavor compounds, which are subsequently
   converted into fatty acids during steaming ([80]Matsui et al., 2003).
   The volatile compounds produced after steaming are mainly the result of
   lipid oxidation and the interactions between products of lipid
   oxidation and those of the Maillard reaction ([81]Wang et al., 2022). A
   total of 19 fatty acids were identified in RKM and SKM samples
   ([82]Fig. 1A). After steaming, the total contents of saturated fatty
   acids (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), and polyunsaturated
   fatty acids (PUFA) increased significantly, indicating that the fats in
   Antarctic krill were degraded by the steaming process. Lipid oxidative
   degradation is a key pathway for flavor formation, and certain
   unsaturated fatty acids, such as oleic and linoleic acids, are
   particularly prone to oxidation into peroxides during steaming due to
   the presence of double bonds in their molecules. The further
   decomposition of these peroxides generates ketones, aldehydes,
   alcohols, and other compounds. Previous studies have shown that
   hydroperoxides can also form from SFA, MUFA, and esters ([83]Abdelrazig
   et al., 2020).
Fig. 1.
   [84]Fig. 1
   [85]Open in a new tab
   Effects of oxidative degradation of fat and proteolysis on flavor
   compounds. (A) Fatty acid composition of steamed Antarctic krill.
   Different letters showed significant differences between RKM and SKM
   for the same fatty acids (P < 0.05). (B) Possible pathways for the
   formation of nonanal and 1-octen-3-ol during the steamed in Antarctic
   krill. (C) Analysis of amino acid break sites of steamed Antarctic
   krill.
   The flavor components of Antarctic krill, including ketones,
   hydrocarbons, and aldehydes, are primarily generated through lipid
   degradation and oxidation during steaming ([86]Matsui et al., 2003).
   Linear fatty aldehydes and alkanes are typical lipid oxidation products
   ([87]Farvin et al., 2012). Nonanal is a product formed through the
   oxidation of oleic acid ([88]Cao et al., 2014), while the odor-active
   compound 1-octen-3-ol, found in krill meat samples, is formed through
   the oxidative degradation of linoleic acid ([89]Fig. 1B).
3.3. Analysis of polypeptides in flavor extract of steamed Antarctic krill
   Polypeptides can exhibit taste characteristics such as bitterness,
   umami, sweetness, and sourness, playing a crucial role in enhancing
   food flavor ([90]Warren et al., 2017). Many known umami peptides are
   derived from hydrolyzed animal proteins ([91]Zelena et al., 2009). For
   instance, [92]Want et al. (2013) identified umami peptides such as SEE,
   EEE, EDE, and DES from fish protein hydrolysate. As shown in [93]Table
   3, several peptide sequences were identified from taste extracts of
   heat-treated Antarctic krill.The peptides EDPIVP and EDPLVP had
   relatively higher sweetness and umami scores compared to others
   ([94]Table 3). It has been reported that the taste characteristics of
   peptides may be related to the types of amino acid residues within
   their sequence, with peptides containing more umami amino acid residues
   tending to have a stronger umami taste ([95]Horai et al., 2010).
Table 3.
   Cleavage sites and taste of peptides in heat-induced Antarctic krill.
   Sequence Cleavage sites Confidence Taste prediction (scores)
     __________________________________________________________________
   Sour Sweet Bitter Salty Umami
   ETGLKYFPSQGNFIVIDFGIDGDEVFQYLL KETGLKYFPSQGNFIVIDFGIDGDEVFQYLLS >95 %
   0.2667 0.3000 0.9000 0.1333 0.3000
   PAGMVVNPITSTQQGNLSTQQPSIIAH PPAGMVVNPITSTQQGNLSTQQPSIIAHN >95 % 0.0370
   0.3333 0.3704 N 0.0370
   LFDYPIFFALGLFSSTFGFIMLGAM VLFDYPIFFALGLFSSTFGFIMLGAMG >95 % 0.0400
   0.2400 1.0000 0.0400 0.0400
   DPSGDRLRQWLDIDKDIFYNPNK NDPSGDRLRQWLDIDKDIFYNPNKI >95 % 0.3043 0.2174
   0.6957 0.2174 0.2609
   DAERIHGISTELAMEQGVSLQEVL YDAERIHGISTELAMEQGVSLQEVLA >95 % 0.2917 0.2917
   0.5833 0.0417 0.4167
   AGFAGDDAPRAVFPSIVGRPR KAGFAGDDAPRAVFPSIVGRPRH >95 % 0.1429 0.5714
   1.0000 0.1429 0.2381
   SGISNKIASLLKQDWGSLE RSGISNKIASLLKQDWGSLEE >95 % 0.2105 0.2632 0.6316
   0.0526 0.1053
   KSVVKEVTSAGGDIVLFI LKSVVKEVTSAGGDIVLFID >95 % 0.2778 0.6111 0.7778
   0.0556 0.2222
   DPSQSLSETEFVGL WDPSQSLSETEFVGLA >95 % 0.2857 0.2143 0.7143 0.0714
   0.4286
   ENVLITTPKTN QENVLITTPKTNN >95 % 0.2727 0.2727 0.6364 N 0.0909
   TAVHHPLIDIVA KTAVHHPLIDIVAD >95 % 0.0833 0.4167 0.7500 0.0833 0.0833
   DQVLLSGVQGIT ADQVLLSGVQGITD >95 % 0.0833 0.3333 0.6667 0.0833 0.0833
   QDVIIKELQGS IQDVIIKELQGSE >95 % 0.3636 0.2727 0.6364 0.0909 0.2727
   PIDEPVIP QPIDEPVIPG >95 % 0.3750 0.5000 0.8750 0.2500 0.3750
   ELPDPVIP RELPDPVIPE >95 % 0.2500 0.5000 1.0000 0.1250 0.3750
   EDPIVP EEDPIVPP >95 % 0.5000 0.5000 0.6667 0.3333 0.5000
   EDPLVP SEDPLVPS >95 % 0.5000 0.5000 1.0000 0.3333 0.5000
   [96]Open in a new tab
   Note: N means not detected; The BIOPEP database for peptides and amino
   acids ([97]https://biochemia.uwm.edu.pl/biopep-uwm/).
   The study revealed that the umami taste enhancement thresholds of
   ALPEEV and EAGIQ were 1.52 mmol/L and 1.94 mmol/L, respectively
   ([98]Sud et al., 2007). These peptides, known to possess umami taste,
   were predicted and scored using the same method applied in this study.
   The results showed umami scores of 0.8333 for ALPEEV and 0.4000 for
   EAGIQ. In comparison, the umami scores of EDPIVP and EDPLVP, identified
   in this study, were both 0.5000, falling between the values of 0.4000
   and 0.8333. This suggests that the umami threshold of EDPIVP and EDPLVP
   might range between 1.52 and 1.94 mmol/L, confirming the reliability of
   the prediction method used. Therefore, the polypeptides
   AGFAGDDAPRAVFPSIVGRPR, ELPDPVIP, EDPIVP, and EDPLVP, isolated from
   steamed Antarctic krill, exhibit both umami and sweetness.
   Additionally, these peptides showed relatively high bitterness scores,
   likely due to the presence of hydrophobic amino acids in their
   sequences.
3.4. Analysis of peptide chain amino acid cleavage site of steamed Antarctic
krill
   The principle of the Edman degradation method involves modifying the
   N-terminal of water-soluble small peptides in the sample and
   subsequently cleaving them. This allows the determination of the amino
   acid cleavage sites at the N-terminus of larger peptide chains during
   the formation of smaller peptide hydrolysis products, based on changes
   in free amino acid content. After steaming, a significant increase in
   the content of certain amino acids indicates the specific cleavage
   sites in the peptide chain. For instance, the contents of E, R, T, A,
   Y, and V increased significantly after steaming ([99]Fig. 1C),
   suggesting that the peptide chain cleaved at these sites during the
   steaming process.
3.5. Non-targeted metabolomics analysis of Antarctic krill during steaming
3.5.1. Multivariate statistical analysis
   Non-targeted metabolomics was used to identify and analyze metabolites
   in Antarctic krill before and after steaming, using both positive
   (left) and negative (right) ion scanning modes. The base peak
   chromatogram ([100]Fig. 2A) of the samples showed that the trends
   across different groups of Antarctic krill samples were similar,
   indicating good repeatability. Quality control (QC) procedures
   ([101]Fig. 2B) were performed to remove characteristic peaks that did
   not meet the requirements (RSD > 30 %), resulting in a higher-quality
   dataset ([102]Fig. 2C). The PCA score plot demonstrated that the QC
   samples clustered together, confirming the reliability and
   reproducibility of the analysis. Following LC-Orbitrap-MS analysis, a
   total of 7572 metabolites were detected. As shown in [103]Fig. 3A,
   while the content of most metabolites decreased, some compounds
   increased in SKM. This indicates that steaming caused significant
   changes in the metabolite content of Antarctic krill. [104]Fig. 3B
   showed the hierarchical clustering tree diagram of samples before and
   after steaming. The samples were classified into two distinct
   categories, indicating significant changes between SKM and RKM samples.
   OPLS-DA (Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis) is
   effective for filtering irrelevant information and accurately analyzing
   the differences and associations of metabolites across different
   samples ([105]Heidrich et al., 2021). As shown in the scores plot
   ([106]Fig. 3C), the separation between RKM and SKM reflects notable
   changes in the metabolites of Antarctic krill after steaming. The
   samples within the RKM group showed good aggregation, while some
   separation within the SKM group could be attributed to thermal
   induction. The OPLS-DA analysis yielded key parameters: R^2X = 0.536,
   R^2Y = 0.999, and Q^2 = 0.964, all exceeding 0.5, indicating that the
   model is robust for identifying differential metabolites. The OPLS-DA
   S-plot ([107]Fig. 3D) highlights the differential metabolite profiles
   crucial for distinguishing between RKM and SKM.
Fig. 2.
   [108]Fig. 2
   [109]Open in a new tab
   (A) Base peak chart of typical samples. (B) Principal component
   analysis score plot of quality control. (C) Relative standard deviation
   distribution of quality assurance.
Fig. 3.
   [110]Fig. 3
   [111]Open in a new tab
   Multivariate statistical analysis. (A) Hierarchical clustering heat map
   of metabolites. (B) Clustering analysis. (C) OPLS-DA Score Plot. (D)
   OPLS-DA s-plot.
3.5.2. Detection and identification of differential metabolites
   Differential metabolite screening was conducted using VIP values, which
   reflect the importance of each variable in the first principal
   component of OPLS-DA. A higher VIP value indicates a greater
   contribution of the variable to the grouping. Additionally, a t-test
   was conducted to further evaluate the significance of metabolites
   between groups. Metabolites with VIP values greater than 1 and P-values
   less than 0.05 were considered as potential biomarkers. The analysis
   identified several potential biomarkers in both the RKM and SKM groups,
   including hydrocarbons, amino acids and their derivatives, organic
   acids, organic bases, aldehydes, esters, and fatty acids. Specifically,
   the expression of 21 metabolites was up-regulated, including
   acetylcholine chloride, niacinamide, pyridoxine, methyl jasmonate,
   dTMP, and cis-4-hydroxy-L-proline. Conversely, the expression of 136
   metabolites was down-regulated, including L-aspartic acid, citric acid,
   guanosine monophosphate (GMP), L-lysine, L-methionine, and
   L-phenylalanine.
   Hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) is a widely used method in data
   mining and statistics to explore the diversity in metabolite profiles
   across different experimental samples. In this study, HCA was employed
   to reveal variations among the metabolite profiles of the samples. As
   shown in [112]Fig. 4A, the color gradient from blue to red represents
   the range of metabolite expression abundance, with blue indicating low
   expression and red indicating high expression. The color gradient
   clearly illustrates the differences in metabolite levels between RKM
   and SKM samples. Notably, the expression of differential metabolites
   was significantly down-regulated in steamed Antarctic krill, consistent
   with the previously observed results.
Fig. 4.
   [113]Fig. 4
   [114]Open in a new tab
   Detection and identification of differential metabolites. (A)
   Hierarchical clustering heatmap of differential metabolites. (B)
   Volcano Plot. (C) Z-score Plot. (D) Differential metabolic matter
   charge ratio and P-Value Scattering Plot. (E) Analysis of differential
   metabolite formation pathways.
   The standard score (Z-score) map provides a visual comparison of the
   relative contents of differential metabolites between the RKM and SKM
   samples at the same level. From the differential metabolite volcano
   plot ([115]Fig. 4B), it is evident that the expression fold difference
   between the RKM and SKM samples is most pronounced. The four
   metabolites showing the most significant differential expression are
   hydroquinone, 5-hydroxypentanoic acid, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and
   L-2,4-diaminobutyric acid. [116]Fig. 4C presents the standard scores of
   differential metabolites in Antarctic krill samples before and after
   steaming. The higher the value on the ordinate, the greater the
   metabolite content. This visualization provides an intuitive comparison
   of the relative contents of 157 differential metabolites between the
   RKM and SKM groups, highlighting that thermal induction caused
   significant changes in the samples. [117]Fig. 4D displays a scatter
   plot of the mass-to-charge ratio versus P-value for the metabolites,
   offering a clear and intuitive view of the distribution of key
   differential metabolites. Metabolites with significant differential
   expression (P < 0.05) include methyl jasmonate,
   3-dehydro-scyllo-inosose, uracil, and pyridoxine.
3.5.3. Analysis of differential metabolite formation pathways in steamed
Antarctic krill
   The related metabolic network ([118]Fig. 4E) illustrated the
   correlation of differential metabolites in Antarctic krill before and
   after thermal induction, and explored possible metabolic pathways of
   these metabolites. Amino acids emerged as the most frequently involved
   metabolites, forming a prominent cluster that includes phenylalanine,
   glycine and serine, key differential metabolites affected by steaming.
   Additionally, several amino acids, such as aspartic acid, methionine,
   lysine and leucine, which played important roles in the flavor of
   Antarctic krill, were significantly downregulated after steaming.
   The observed reduction in amino acid levels may result from their
   participation in the Maillard reaction, where they react with glucose
   or other carbohydrates during heat processing, leading to a decrease in
   their content. This aligned with the previous findings that these
   changes in amino acids not only directly influenced the flavor
   characteristics of Antarctic krill but also synergize with nucleotides
   such as GMP and AMP, further enhancing or modifying the umami profile
   ([119]Zhong et al., 2021). The identification of various nucleotide
   derivatives underscores their importance in flavor formation. Previous
   research ([120]Chen et al., 2021) had similarly demonstrated the role
   of GMP and other nucleotides in enhancing the umami taste of seafood.
   Therefore, the flavor changes in Antarctic krill during steaming were
   the result of a multifaceted interplay between regulated metabolic
   pathways.
   The mechanisms underlying flavor formation in steamed Antarctic krill
   are highly complex and involve the interplay of lipid oxidation, amino
   acid metabolism, and nucleotide interactions, among other biochemical
   processes. Amino acid metabolism and nucleotide metabolism jointly
   serve as key contributors, with the reduction of certain amino acids
   and the formation of nucleotide derivatives significantly shaping the
   flavor profile. The oxidation and degradation of lipids serve as
   primary pathways for flavor development. During steaming, unsaturated
   fatty acids, such as oleic and linoleic acids, undergo oxidation due to
   their chemical susceptibility (double bonds), producing hydroperoxides.
   These hydroperoxides subsequently decompose into various flavor-active
   compounds, including ketones, aldehydes, and alcohols. For instance,
   nonanal is a key product derived from oleic acid oxidation, while
   1-octen-3-ol, a crucial odor-active compound, originates from linoleic
   acid degradation. Saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids also
   contribute to flavor by forming linear aldehydes and hydrocarbons
   ([121]Farvin et al., 2012; [122]Matsui et al., 2003). These lipid
   oxidation products form the backbone of the characteristic aroma of
   steamed Antarctic krill. They are further enriched through interactions
   with Maillard reaction intermediates.
   The interplay between lipid oxidation and the Maillard reaction plays a
   pivotal role in flavor complexity. Lipid oxidation products, such as
   aldehydes, can react with Maillard reaction intermediates to generate
   secondary volatile compounds, including furans and alcohols. These
   cross-reactions enhance the sensory attributes of steamed krill by
   adding depth to its roasted and savory flavor. Aromatic amino acids,
   such as phenylalanine, also participate in metabolic pathways linked to
   secondary metabolite biosynthesis. These processes contribute to the
   chemical diversity of flavor compounds formed during steaming.
   In summary, the flavor formation in steamed Antarctic krill is a result
   of a multifaceted interplay between lipid oxidation, amino acid
   metabolism, and Maillard reactions. Lipid-derived volatiles, amino acid
   degradation products, and nucleotide interactions collectively shape
   the distinctive umami and aromatic profile of krill. This study
   advances the understanding of molecular mechanisms involved in seafood
   flavor development and offers valuable guidance for optimizing
   processing techniques in the food industry.
4. Conclusion
   This study provided a detailed analysis of the volatile compounds,
   metabolites, and taste characteristics of Antarctic krill before and
   after steaming. HS-SPME-GC–MS identified various volatile compounds,
   including alcohols, aldehydes, and ketones, which contribute to the
   krill's flavor profile. Notably, the content of nonanal and
   1-octen-3-ol significantly increased after steaming due to lipid
   degradation. Metabolite profiling revealed substantial shifts in
   metabolite content, with significant downregulation of L-aspartic acid,
   citric acid, GMP, L-lysine, L-methionine and L-phenylalanine during
   steaming. Hydroquinone, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and
   L-2,4-diaminobutyric acid were identified as the most significantly
   altered metabolites. Metabolic network further linked these shifts to
   reactions involving amino acids, nucleotide and other compounds during
   steaming. The results highlighted that steaming significantly affects
   both the chemical composition and flavor of Antarctic krill, offering
   valuable insights into the metabolic transformations during food
   processing.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
   Tingting Yang: Writing – original draft, Software, Methodology,
   Investigation, Data curation. Yang Liu: Software, Methodology. Jing
   Bai: Writing – review & editing, Methodology. Yan Fan: Writing – review
   & editing, Visualization. Ye Chen: Methodology, Investigation. Ping
   Dong: Writing – review & editing. Xia Yang: Writing – review & editing,
   Software. Hu Hou: Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition.
Declaration of competing interest
   The authors declare that they have no known competing financial
   interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to
   influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements