Abstract Identifying the molecular targets for the beneficial effects of active small-molecule compounds simultaneously is an important and currently unmet challenge. In this study, we firstly proposed network analysis by integrating data from network pharmacology and metabolomics to identify targets of active components in sini decoction (SND) simultaneously against heart failure. To begin with, 48 potential active components in SND against heart failure were predicted by serum pharmacochemistry, text mining and similarity match. Then, we employed network pharmacology including text mining and molecular docking to identify the potential targets of these components. The key enriched processes, pathways and related diseases of these target proteins were analyzed by STRING database. At last, network analysis was conducted to identify most possible targets of components in SND. Among the 25 targets predicted by network analysis, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) was firstly experimentally validated in molecular and cellular level. Results indicated that hypaconitine, mesaconitine, higenamine and quercetin in SND can directly bind to TNF-α, reduce the TNF-α-mediated cytotoxicity on L929 cells and exert anti-myocardial cell apoptosis effects. We envisage that network analysis will also be useful in target identification of a bioactive compound. __________________________________________________________________ Bioactive compounds exert their biological activities through direct physical binding to one or more cellular proteins[36]^1. The detection of drug-target interactions is therefore necessary for the characterization of compound mechanism of action[37]^2. There are two fundamentally different approaches to identify molecular targets of bioactive molecules: direct and indirect[38]^3. The direct approach utilizes affinity chromatography often with compound-immobilized beads. Many compounds cannot be modified without loss of binding specificity or affinity[39]^4. Moreover, because of above characteristics, this approach is only suitable to identify targets of one drug once and cannot afford target identification of many compounds simultaneously, such as active components in herbs. With the indirect approach, such as system biology approaches, including proteomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics, are the major tools for target identification and have an unbiased attitude towards all active compounds[40]^5. A proteomic or transcriptomics approach for identification of binding proteins for a given small molecule or compounds in herbs involves comparison of the protein expression profiles for a given cell or tissue in the presence or absence of the given molecule(s). These two methods have been proved successful in target identification of both many compounds and one drug[41]^6,[42]^7,[43]^8,[44]^9. Whereas metabolomics has been mainly developed to identify drug(s)-affected pathways[45]^10,[46]^11, the “readout”, such as proteins in the pathway, is often far downstream from the drug targets. Therefore using metabolomics for target identification run into the bottleneck. As bioactive molecules exert their effects through direct physical association with one or more cellular proteins[47]^1, these target proteins will then act on related proteins, above proteins eventually affect the content of related metabolites. With the advent of the era of big data, now there are large amounts of data about known and predicted protein interactions[48]^12. Once we use network pharmacology to predict potential targets of active components in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) formula[49]^13, a component-target protein-related protein-metabolite network can be constructed with the combination of network pharmacology and metabolomics. As a combination of approaches is most likely to bear fruit, the combination of network pharmacology and metabolomics called network analysis could increase the degree of accuracy of target identification of network pharmacology. In addition, metabolomics and network pharmacology employed global profiling methods for the comprehensive analysis of altered metabolites and target proteins, providing insights into the global state of entire organisms, which are well coincident with the integrity and systemic feature of TCM formula. Thus apart from target identification of a bioactive compound, this network analysis method is more beneficial in identifying unknown targets of active compounds in TCM formula simultaneously in an unbiased fashion. Here, we introduce a new, potentially widely applicable and accurate drug target identification strategy based on network analysis to identify the interactions of active components in TCM formula and target proteins. Our previous studies have confirmed that SND, composed of three medicinal plants: Aconitum carmichaelii, Zingiber officinale and Glycyrrhiza uralensis, can treat heart failure[50]^14. Metabolomics researches have also been conducted to demonstrate its effectiveness[51]^14,[52]^15. Chemome[53]^16, serum pharmacochemistry[54]^16 and xenobiotic metabolome[55]^17 of SND were also characterized. Thus in this study, we took SND as an example to test the potential of network analysis in target identification. Active components in SND against heart failure were identified by serum pharmacochemistry, text mining and similarity match. Their potential targets were then identified by network analysis. At last, the most possible target was validated experimentally to demonstrate the potential of network analysis. Above results will be helpful to investigate the action mechanisms of SND and promote the development of Chinese Drug modernization. More importantly, network analysis will not only conferred a unique advantage to identify targets of active compounds in TCM formula simultaneously, but also provided a new method for the target identification of a bioactive compound. Detailed procedures can be seen in [56]Fig. 1. Figure 1. The flowchart of network analysis approach. [57]Figure 1 [58]Open in a new tab Results The rationality of components in SND in absorption and metabolism Results considering the known metabolism of components in SND have been concluded in [59]Supplementary Table S1. Total flavones (H) and total saponins (Z) were major active components in Glycyrrhiza uralensis. From [60]Table S1, we can conclude that many flavones and saponins in Glycyrrhiza uralensis were known CYP450 inhibitor, while alkaloids in Aconitum carmichaelii are mostly not. Conclusions can be made that Glycyrrhiza uralensis can inhibit the metabolism of alkaloids and improve their bioavailability. Researchers also demonstrated that Glycyrrhiza uralensis can improve bioavailability of diester diterpenoid alkaloids in Aconitum carmichaelli, which coincided with results above. And researchers found that Aconitum carmichaelli can also improve the bioavailability of glycyrrhizic acid which is a major component in Glycyrrhiza uralensis[61]^18, so we can conclude that the combination of Aconitum carmichaelli and Glycyrrhiza uralensis can enhance efficacy of each medicinal materials. In addition, Zingiber officinale could promote the elimination of diester diterpenoid alkaloids and enhance the absorption of monoester diterpenoid alkaloids[62]^19. As diester alkaloids are the chief toxic components in Aconitum carmichaelli. The results might be helpful in explaining the mechanism of combination of Aconitum carmichaelli− Zingiber officinale to decrease toxicity and increase efficacy. Researchers also proved that compared with Aconitum Carmichaeli, the bioavailability of three monoester-diterpenoid alkaloids increased in SND[63]^20. And compared with Aconitum Carmichaeli, the bioavailability of hypaconitine,i.e. diester diterpenoid alkaloids decreased in SND. The SND formula can decrease toxicity and increase efficacy. The information above demonstrated the rationality of components of SND in Absorption and metabolism. Compound families and chemical space properties of active components in SND To give an overview of the compound families in SND, chemical clustering was conducted ([64]Supplementary Fig. S1A). The areas of overlap may show that active components in SND and anti- heart failure drugs are physicochemical property similar, resulting in similar pharmacological actions against heart failure[65]^21. In addition, the active components are also clustered in three independent areas (region B, C and D), indicating that the active components may be structurally or pharmacologically different in three herbs. The physicochemical characteristics of a compound are important for its drug likeness. Comparing the physicochemical characteristics of active components in SND with FDA-approved oral drugs will provide insight into the drug likeness of these components. Here, seven physicochemical characteristics of active components in SND were compared with approved orally administered drugs ([66]Supplementary Fig. S1B–H). The overall shapes of the distributions of these characteristics are similar between active components in SND and approved oral drugs, which indicates that many ingredients in herbs have drug potential. The proportion of compounds with more than 10 rotatable bonds in SND is more than in approved drugs ([67]Supplementary Fig. S1G), which means the structures of ingredients in SND are more flexible. There are statistically significant differences between drug and herb of all variables in the aspect of distribution by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test in [68]Supplementary Table S2. As all variables in both drug and herb do not follow normal distributions, we conducted wilcoxon test to evaluate the difference of all variables in drug and herb. The results showed that there are significant differences between drug and herb of all variables in the aspect of median except for Polar Surface Area in [69]Supplementary Table S2. To make a conclusion, physiological characteristics of active components in SND are special while compared with approved oral drugs in the median and distribution. Prediction analysis of pharmacological mechanism based on network pharmacology We constructed the component-target network ([70]Fig. 2A) based on text mining and docking. This network had 109 nodes and 556 edges, in which red circles and hexagons correspond to active components and target proteins, respectively. Many targets in the middle of [71]Fig. 2A are targeted by components in three medicinal herbs, which meant that these targets are main potential targets. According to the data from CHEMBL, BindingDB and PubMed database, 13 out of 61 potential targets were validated to be exact targets of active components in SND ([72]Supplementary Table S3), which proved the reliability of molecular docking and text mining. Figure 2. [73]Figure 2 [74]Open in a new tab (A) The Component-Target network. The red circles represent the 48 active components in SND, S, J, H and Z refers to alkaloids, gingerols, flavones and saponins in Aconitum carmichaelii, Zingiber officinale and Glycyrrhiza uralensis. The blue hexagons represent the gene names of targets of the three herbs found by text mining, while the green hexagons are the targets found by dock. The yellow hexagons represent the gene names of targets found both by text mining and dock. Targets in the center of network represent the common targets of three herbs, and targets in the curve of S, J or H and Z represent the targets of each kind of active components respectively. (B) The enrichment analysis in biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions of 61 identified target proteins by STRING database. The STRING database (version 10.0) ([75]http://string-db.org/) was used to elucidate biological processes, Cellular components, molecular functions and pathways of target proteins. And we only choose meaningful pathways, biological processes, Cellular components and molecular functions with a p value < 0.05 as key pathways, processes, components and functions. Functional classification of target proteins is detailed in [76]Fig. 2B. Molecular function of the target proteins is classified to two categories: binding and receptor activity ([77]Fig. 2B). The binding activities that appeared are mainly associated with receptor binding and enzyme binding. And the receptor activity is adrenergic receptor activity. According to the classification of cellular component, the proteins are located in cytoplasmic part, extracellular region and membrane region. The biological processes that the target proteins are involved can be summarized in [78]Fig. 2B. The results firstly demonstrated that SND exerted its protective effects by regulation of blood circulation[79]^22, response to oxidative stress[80]^23,[81]^24, regulation of apoptotic process[82]^25 and inflammatory response[83]^26, which coincided with previous researches. In addition, the results also indicated that active components in SND could also exert anti- heart failure effect through regulation of blood pressure, regulation of vasodilation, regulation of muscle contraction, regulation of heart contraction, blood coagulation and regulation of angiogenesis. Although large amounts of references showed that the