Abstract Purpose To investigate the clinicopathological value and potential roles of microRNA-198 (miR-198) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods Ninety-five formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded HCC and the para-cancerous liver tissues were gathered. Real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction was applied to determine the miR-198 expression. The association between the miR-198 expression and clinicopathological features was examined. Meanwhile, potential target messenger RNAs of miR-198 in HCC were obtained from 14 miRNA prediction databases and natural language processing method, in which we pooled the genes related to the tumorigenesis and progression of HCC and classified them by their frequency. The selected target genes were finally analyzed in the Gene Ontology analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway. Results miR-198 expression was significantly lower in HCC than that in adjacent noncancerous liver tissues (1.30±0.72 vs 2.01±0.58, P<0.001). Low miR-198 expression was also correlated to hepatitis C virus infection (r=−0.48, P<0.001), tumor capsular infiltration (r=−0.43, P<0.001), metastasis (r=−0.26, P<0.010), number of tumor nodes (r=−0.25, P=0.013), vaso-invasion (r=−0.24, P=0.017), and clinical tumor node metastasis stage (r=−0.23, P=0.024). Altogether, 1,048 genes were achieved by the concurrent prediction from at least four databases and natural language processing indicated 1,800 genes for HCC. Further, 127 overlapping targets were further proceeded with for pathway analysis. The most enriched Gene Ontology terms in the potential target messenger RNAs of miR-198 were cell motion, cell migration, cell motility, and regulation of cell proliferation in biological process; organelle lumen, membrane-enclosed lumen, and nuclear lumen in cellular component; and enzyme binding, protein domain-specific binding, and protein kinase activity in molecular function. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis showed that these target genes were obviously involved in focal adhesion and pathways in cancer. Conclusion Lower expression of miR-198 was related to several clinicopathological parameters in HCC patients. miR-198 might play a regulatory role through its target genes in the development of HCC. Keywords: miR-198, hepatocellular carcinoma, metastasis, RT-qPCR, in silico Introduction Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent malignancies in the world. The estimate incidence of liver cancer ranked fourth and its mortality ranked third in People’s Republic of China, 2015.[43]^1 Currently, several genes have been identified to be related with the tumorigenesis and progression of HCC, but the molecular mechanisms of their functions and interactions have not been clearly studied. Therefore, it is urgent to find the potential function of these genes during the development of HCC. MicroRNA (miRNA) is classified as endogenous noncoding RNA, repressing protein translation by binding to their target genes.[44]^2 From nearly all biological processes, miRNA can exert the function as posttranscriptional regulation.[45]^3 Aberrant expression of microRNA-198 (miR-198) has been found to be correlated to the carcinogenesis and disease progression of several classes of cancers, including lung adenocarcinoma,[46]^4 esophageal cancer,[47]^5 squamous cell carcinoma of tongue,[48]^6 retinoblastoma,[49]^7 pancreatic adenocarcinoma,[50]^8 multiple myeloma,[51]^9 colorectal cancer,[52]^10 and prostate cancer.[53]^11 However, there were only three research papers studying the expression of miR-198 in HCC. Varnholt et al first reported the lower expressed miR-198 in Caucasian patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) related HCC.[54]^12 Tan et al identified the suppressing role of miR-198 in HGF/c-MET pathway that influenced migration and invasion of HCC cells.[55]^13 Elfimova et al found another pathway that was repressed by miR-198 in vitro which could negatively regulate cell growth and migration.[56]^14 However, whether miR-198 is related to clinicopathological parameters has not been studied, there still remains a mystery regarding miR-198’s role in the key processes of hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Thus, in this study, we assessed the expression of miR-198 in tumor tissues of HCC patients with their paired noncancerous liver. In addition, the relationship of miR-198 with several clinicopathological parameters was also investigated. Moreover, we predicted the target genes of miR-198 via 14 miRNA databases and filtered in the natural language processing (NLP) to achieve the specific messenger RNAs (mRNA) profiles of miR-198 targets for HCC. Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway annotation were further undertaken to explore the function of these mRNAs. We attempted to pioneer the use of real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and in silico method to clarify the potential molecular mechanism of miR-198, providing guidelines for the following research on miR-198 in HCC. Materials and methods Tissue samples There were 95 cases of HCCs and their paired paraneoplastic liver formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues included in this retrospective study. The age of the HCC patients ranged from 29 to 82 years old, with a mean age of 52 years. All the clinicopathological features are provided in [57]Table 1. Adjacent noncancerous liver tissues were obtained from the location at least 2 cm away from the tumor node. The adjacent tissue was from the same HCC patient. We designed these paired sample groups in order to eliminate the individual difference. Tumor sizes of HCC ranged from 1 to 11 cm (mean size, 6.4 cm). All cases were from patients who were under initial hepatectomies without any treatment and they were randomly chosen from hepatectomy surgeries in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, People’s Republic of China between March 2010 and December 2011. The research protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. Written informed consent was signed by the patients for the treatment and sample usage in this study. All samples were diagnosed by three pathologists independently (Dian-zhong Luo, Zhen-bo Feng, Gang Chen). Table 1. Relationship between the expression of miR-198 and clinicopathological features in HCC Clinicopathological feature n miR-198 relevant expression (2^−ΔCq) __________________________________________________________________ Mean ± SD t P-value Tissue  Adjacent noncancerous liver 95 2.01±0.58 7.53 <0.001[58]^***,[59]^a  Noncirrhotic liver 50 1.96±0.57 −0.76 0.449[60]^b  Cirrhotic liver 45 2.06±0.59 5.67 <0.001[61]^***,[62]^c  HCC 95 1.30±0.72 6.25 <0.001[63]^***,[64]^d Age, years  ≥50 46 1.42±0.74 1.66 0.10  <50 49 1.18±0.68 Sex  Male 75 1.30±0.69 0.04 0.97  Female 20 1.29±0.83 Differentiation  High 6 1.87±0.52 10.20 <0.001[65]^***,[66]^e  Moderate 60 1.45±0.74  Low 29 0.87±0.45 Size (cm)  <5 18 1.48±0.72 0.99 0.33  ≥5 77 1.26±0.72 Tumor nodes  Single 52 1.47±0.76 2.72 0.008[67]^**  Multi 43 1.08±0.61 Metastasis  Without metastasis 46 1.49±0.73 2.62 0.01[68]^*  With metastasis 49 1.12±0.66 Clinical TNM stage  I–II 22 1.60±0.72 2.34 0.021[69]^*  III–IV 73 1.21±0.69 Portal vein tumor embolus  − 63 1.35±0.71 1.03 0.31  + 32 1.19±0.72 Vaso-invasion  − 59 1.42±0.69 2.23 0.028[70]^*  + 36 1.09±0.71 Tumor capsular infiltration  With complete capsule 45 1.64±0.77 4.92 <0.001[71]^***  No capsule infiltration 50 0.99±0.50 HCV  − 63 1.53±0.71 5.89 <0.001[72]^***  + 32 0.83±0.44 HBV  − 17 1.42±0.78 0.77 0.44  + 78 1.27±0.70 AFP  − 41 1.40±0.79 1.36 0.18  + 38 1.17±0.71 Cirrhosis  − 50 1.21±0.71 −1.30 0.20  + 45 1.40±0.72 nm23  − 20 1.29±0.67 −0.07 0.95  + 75 1.30±0.73 P53  − 40 1.29±0.75 −0.04 0.97  + 55 1.30±0.69 P21  − 62 1.34±0.78 0.81 0.42  + 33 1.22±0.58 VEGF  − 25 1.15±0.65 −1.21 0.23  + 70 1.35±0.73 Ki-67LI  Low 47 1.40±0.72 1.37 0.18  High 48 1.20±0.70 MVD  Low 47 1.24±0.67 −0.73 0.47  High 48 1.35±0.76 [73]Open in a new tab Notes: ^* P<0.05, ^** P<0.01, ^*** P<0.001. ^a Adjacent noncancerous liver (including liver with and without cirrhosis) vs HCC. ^b Noncirrhotic liver vs cirrhotic liver. ^c Noncirrhotic liver vs HCC. ^d Cirrhotic liver vs HCC. ^e Differentiation group pairwise comparison: high vs low differentiation (t=4.851, P<0.001) and moderate vs low (t=4.610, P<0.001) have significant differences, high vs moderate (t=1.336, P=0.186) has no difference. Abbreviations: AFP, alpha fetal protein; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus; miR-198, microRNA-198; MVD, microvessel density; SD, standard deviation; TNM, tumor node metastasis; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. RT-qPCR Total RNA including miRNA was extracted from tumor and nontumorous liver sections and the miRNeasy FFPE kit (QIAGEN, KJ Venlo, the Netherlands) was applied according to our previous reports.[74]^15^–[75]^17 RNA concentrations were measured by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). The OD260/OD280 ratio of the total mRNA (including miRNA) isolated from the FFPE tissues ranged from 1.84 to 2.06, and OD260/OD230 from 1.90 to 2.04. The PCR amplification efficiency of all the quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) reactions ranged from 91.0% to 95.2%. A combination of RUN6B and RUN48 was chosen as the house-keeping reference for detection of miR-198 expression. The primers of miR-198, as well as RNU6B and RNU48, were provided by TaqMan^® MicroRNA Assays (4427975, Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). Sequence of miRNA and references in the paper were as follows: miR-198 (Applied Biosystems