Abstract Drought can severely damage crops, resulting in major yield losses. During drought, vascular land plants conserve water via stomatal closure. Each stomate is bordered by a pair of guard cells that shrink in response to drought and the associated hormone abscisic acid (ABA). The activation of complex intracellular signaling networks underlies these responses. Therefore, analysis of guard cell metabolites is fundamental for elucidation of guard cell signaling pathways. Brassica napus is an important oilseed crop for human consumption and biodiesel production. Here, non-targeted metabolomics utilizing gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were employed for the first time to identify metabolic signatures in response to ABA in B. napus guard cell protoplasts. Metabolome profiling identified 390 distinct metabolites in B. napus guard cells, falling into diverse classes. Of these, 77 metabolites, comprising both primary and secondary metabolites were found to be significantly ABA responsive, including carbohydrates, fatty acids, glucosinolates, and flavonoids. Selected secondary metabolites, sinigrin, quercetin, campesterol, and sitosterol, were confirmed to regulate stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana, B. napus or both species. Information derived from metabolite datasets can provide a blueprint for improvement of water use efficiency and drought tolerance in crops. Introduction Plants are sessile organisms that are continuously subjected during their lifecycles to a spectrum of environmental signals and stimuli, including both abiotic factors such as availability of water, light, and nutrients, and biotic factors such as interactions with both beneficial and pathogenic organisms. Accordingly, plants have evolved a suite of molecular mechanisms for external signal perception and transduction, facilitating acclimation to diverse environmental conditions^[26]1. Water deficit is one of the major abiotic stresses causing severe losses in crop production^[27]2. Drought triggers the biosynthesis, accumulation, and redistribution of abscisic acid (ABA), which promotes stomatal closure, inhibits stomatal opening, and thereby reduces water loss^[28]3–[29]7. The pivotal role of stomata in ABA interactions during drought stress has resulted in extensive efforts to elucidate the ABA signaling pathways of guard cells, which border and regulate stomatal apertures. Genetic screens and recent systems biology studies have revealed many signaling events and molecular components that participate in ABA signaling^[30]8–[31]15. Knowledge of ABA signaling in guard cells has been largely derived from the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, which has limited economic value. Brassica napus, also known as oilseed rape or rape, is one of the largest commercial sources of vegetable oil. B. napus is grown worldwide for both human consumption and biodiesel production. B. napus is susceptible to drought stress, which can cause severe reduction in oilseed production^[32]16. An improved understanding of molecular responses to ABA in B. napus guard cells will inform genetic engineering and breeding approaches to enhance drought tolerance in crops. Large scale B. napus guard cell protoplast isolation from B. napus leaves can be conducted with high purity and yield, which provides optimal material for –omics analyses on this single cell type^[33]17–[34]19. Using an iTRAQ (isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation)-based comparative proteomics approach, 66 and 38 proteins were found to be significantly induced and suppressed by ABA in B. napus guard cells, respectively. These ABA responsive proteins participate in photosynthesis, metabolism, energy, protein synthesis, stress/defense (antioxidant system and glucosinolate-myrosinase system), membrane and transport processes, and protein folding/transport and degradation^[35]10. Recently, 65 thiol-based redox responsive proteins were identified from ABA-treated B. napus guard cells, which highlights redox switches as important regulatory mechanisms in ABA signal transduction in guard cells^[36]14. Metabolites are direct physiological signatures and are highly correlated with phenotypes^[37]20; thus, study of cellular metabolomics is also indispensable for complete understanding of stress responses. Stress responsive metabolomes have been investigated in cell culture and in whole plants or whole organs, but rarely in single cell types^[38]21,[39]22. One landmark application of metabolomics to study the stress regulated metabolome at the level of the single cell type was an investigation of the ABA responsive metabolic changes in guard cell protoplasts from A. thaliana wild type and heterotrimeric G-protein α subunit mutant, gpa1, using targeted metabolomics with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)^[40]12. In targeted metabolomics, paired mass/charge (m/z) ratios of the precursor ion and a selected daughter ion along with the chromatographic retention time, as acquired from analysis of authentic compounds (standards), are employed to identify a metabolite in experimental samples. Eighty-five signaling-related metabolites in A. thaliana guard cells were detected and quantified. The abundance of nearly half of these metabolites (41 out of 85) in wild type guard cells was significantly changed after ABA treatment. Interaction with other hormones, particularly indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), in ABA modulated stomatal movement was revealed, validating phytohormone crosstalk^[41]12. These targeted MRM-based profiles of the A. thaliana guard cell metabolome provided the first example of investigating dynamic metabolome changes of a single-cell-type in plants. Plant metabolomes are highly diverse and have been recognized for their nutritional and medicinal value for centuries^[42]23. There are an estimated ~200,000 metabolites produced by the plant kingdom^[43]24. To date, however, only ~100 metabolites have been identified in guard cell protoplasts or implicated in guard cell functions^[44]18. The majority of these metabolites were identified in the targeted metabolomics study of Jin et al.^[45]12, while others were identified in focused studies on a specific metabolite or metabolic pathway. Recently, using guard cell enriched epidermal peels prepared from B. napus leaves, a material relatively easier to obtain, the guard cell metabolite inventory has been expanded to a few hundred metabolites, based on discovery from both targeted and non-targeted metabolomics platforms^[46]25,[47]26. Non-targeted metabolomics provides a complementary approach to targeted metabolomics, with the aim to acquire not only the mass/charge ratio but also the tandem mass spectra of all detected precursor molecules^[48]20. Such information facilitates elucidation of the chemical structure of each molecule. Instead of selective detection of a pre-defined metabolite group, non-targeted metabolomics provides global information on the metabolome. To improve our knowledge of the functional guard cell metabolome, here we employed non-targeted metabolomics workflows utilizing two complementary platforms, i.e., gas chromatography (GC)-mass spectrometry (MS) and liquid chromatography (LC)-MS to profile the B. napus guard cell metabolome and its modulation by ABA, resulting in a profile of 390 non-redundant metabolites, 77 of which were ABA responsive. Based on these results, several secondary metabolites were chosen for targeted study and were found to show either antagonistic or additive effects on ABA-induced stomatal closure. Information derived from metabolite datasets will improve our knowledge of ABA signaling in guard cells. Results Physiological stomatal response to ABA in B. napus ABA regulated stomatal movement has been observed in a wide range of plant species, including A. thaliana and B. napus ^[49]10,[50]12,[51]27,[52]28. Here we first confirmed that 10 µM ABA, a concentration typically used in assays of stomatal responses^[53]29–[54]31, is sufficient to induce stomatal closure in both leaf pieces (Fig. [55]1A) and epidermal peels (Fig. [56]1A) of B. napus line DH12075. ABA-induced stomatal closure was observed within 2 min and closure was complete within 30 min of treatment in both materials (Fig. [57]1A). These results indicate the effectiveness of the ABA concentration used for our subsequent metabolomics analyses on B. napus guard cell protoplasts (GCPs). We also confirmed that the solvent for ABA application, ethanol, had no effect on stomatal apertures (Fig. [58]1A). Figure 1. [59]Figure 1 [60]Open in a new tab Responses to ABA in B. napus leaves, epidermal peels, and guard cell protoplasts. (A) ABA (10 µM) induces stomatal closure in both leaf pieces (left panel) and epidermal peels (right panel) of B. napus line DH12075. Data are means ± standard errors of 3 independent replicates with 100 ± 5 stomata measured for each sample. (B) ABA-induced shrinkage of B. napus GCPs. Representative image (left); scale bar indicates 25 µm. Data (right) are means ± standard errors of 4 independent replicates with 100 ± 5 GCPs measured for each sample. (C) B. napus GCPs are viable following ABA or ethanol (solvent control) treatment. Samples before treatment (0 min) and after treatment (ethanol (EtOH) 60 min and ABA 60 min) were FDA stained to assess cell viability. Scale bars indicate 10 µm. Asterisks in A and B indicate that ABA treatment differed significantly from the EtOH solvent control (Student’s t test; p < 0.05). Although epidermal peels have been used for guard cell related –omics studies^[61]11,[62]25,[63]26,[64]32, our metabolome analyses were performed on guard cell protoplasts, rather than on epidermal peels, in order to exclude metabolites arising from pavement cells and the cuticle. The viability of isolated GCPs (Fig. [65]1B) before and after ABA or ethanol treatment was confirmed by fluorescein diacetate (FDA) staining (Fig. [66]1C). ABA responsiveness of the GCPs was evaluated by measuring protoplast diameters over a time course of ABA treatment (Fig. [67]1B). GCP shrinkage was observed when GCPs were treated with 10 µM ABA as compared to the ethanol (solvent) control (Fig. [68]1B and C). Together, these results confirm that viability and ABA responsiveness were maintained in B. napus GCPs after protoplasting and treatment. Metabolome profiling of B. napus guard cells Two major objectives of this study were metabolome profiling and identification of ABA responsive metabolites in B. napus guard cells. We prepared a total of 226 million B. napus GCPs, obtained in ~50 GCP isolations from ~1500 g of B. napus leaves (fresh weight), for our metabolomics analyses. After protoplasting, B. napus GCPs were left untreated or exposed to a time course of ABA treatment (see next section). Pre-separation by gas chromatography (GC) or liquid chromatography (LC) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry are robust methods to generate fragmentation patterns that can yield definitive metabolite identification. Here we first employed both GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS to explore the B. napus guard cell metabolome. Five replicates, each with 4–4.5 million untreated GCPs, were prepared and analyzed on the two platforms. For our GC-MS/MS analysis, applying a requirement for metabolite presence in at least 4 out of the 5 replicates of untreated sample (0 min) coupled with an identification score over 70 arising from a NIST 11 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA) mass spectral library search as the threshold, led to identification of a total of 53 metabolites. The majority of these metabolites (48 out of 53) are primary metabolites, as is expected for GC-MS analysis^[69]33–[70]35, and fall into the categories of carbohydrates, carboxylic acids, fatty acids and lipids (Fig. [71]2 and Supplemental Table [72]1). For our LC-MS/MS analysis, the same requirement for presence in at least 4 out of the 5 replicates of untreated sample (0 min), coupled with an identification score threshold of ≥0.6 in MassBank, led to an identification of a larger number of metabolites (Fig. [73]2 and Supplemental Table [74]1). Under positive ion mode, 224 metabolites were identified, with nearly 80% involved in secondary metabolism. In particular, a number of carotenoids (subgroup of terpenoids) and flavonoids (subgroup of phenolics) were detected in positive mode (Fig. [75]2A and Supplemental Table [76]1). Under negative ion mode, 168 metabolites were identified, of which nearly two thirds were secondary metabolites, with the dominant group being phenolics (58 out of 168), followed by sugar nucleosides/ nucleotides, carbohydrates and carboxylic acids (Fig. [77]2A and Supplemental Table [78]1). Figure 2. [79]Figure 2 [80]Open in a new tab Metabolomic profiling using complementary platforms resulted in identification of 390 non-redundant metabolites in B. napus GCPs. (A) Classification of metabolites identified from each platform, mainly based on structural characteristics^[81]101. The metabolite categories are listed in the figure caption in the clock-wise order in which they appear in the figure, starting with “Proteinogenic amino acids” at the 12 o’clock position (arrow) in all four pie charts. No metabolites in the category of “Amines and polyamines” were identified by the LC-MS (−) platform. No metabolites were identified by GC-MS in the categories of “Cofactors”, “Non-proteinogenic amino acids”, “Alkaloids”, or “Sulfur-containing”. (B) Venn diagram showing the number of metabolites identified from each platform. In total, 390 non-redundant metabolites were identified by our criteria in untreated B. napus guard cells. Each of the three datasets from GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS positive and negative ion modes contain a unique subset of metabolites and thus these methods are complementary (Fig. [82]2B and Supplemental Table [83]1). Only three metabolites, phenylalanine, ferulic acid, and sinapic acid, were identified by all three acquisition methods (Fig. [84]2B). Only 13 metabolites were found in common between GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS, while 42 were identified by both positive ion mode and negative ion mode in LC-MS/MS (Fig. [85]2B). The KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) PATHWAY database ([86]http://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html) contains a collection of manually compiled KEGG pathway maps representing molecular interaction and reaction networks of metabolism and other functions, derived from multiple organisms, including A. thaliana, B. napus, and B. rapa, a parental ancestor of B. napus. Of the metabolites we identified, there were 286 metabolites with a KEGG compound index. Of these, 124 metabolites mapped to the metabolic pathways available in KEGG from the reference species B. napus. The same set of metabolites also mapped to the metabolic pathways of B. rapa in KEGG. Distribution of identified metabolites on the metabolic map indicates that a wide variety of metabolic pathways are reseprented in the B. napus guard cell metabolome (Supplemental Fig. [87]S1 and Supplemental Table [88]1). There are several reasons for incomplete mapping of all of our identified metabolites: 1) not all metabolites are indexed in KEGG. For example, a few of the flavonoids identified in our profiling, especially those in the glycosidic form, are not available in KEGG (Supplemental Table [89]1), which is consistent with previous observations on other plant metabolomes^[90]36. 2) KEGG pathway maps are based on experimental knowledge of metabolism, which can be far from complete. The Plant Metabolic Network (PMN, [91]http://www.plantcyc.org/) is another valuable compendium of plant compound information^[92]37. Of the metabolites we identified, 128 are included in the B. rapa compound list from PMN, which contains over 1700 non-redundant metabolites. For the 262 metabolites without a hit in the PMN B. rapa compound list, 92 have one or more chemical derivatives in the PMN list (Supplemental Table [93]1). Together with those metabolites mapped to KEGG pathways, 174 metabolites known to be present in B. rapa and/or B. napus are present in our metabolome profiling, suggesting considerable metabolite diversity in B. napus guard cells. Additionally, 29 metabolites out of the 390 metabolites we identified in B. napus guard cells were also detected in a previous, targeted study on A. thaliana guard cells that quantified a set of 85 specific metabolites^[94]12 (Supplemental Table [95]1). Misra et al.^[96]25 and Geng et al.^[97]26 recently reported 268 and 358 metabolites, respectively, in the metabolite profiling of guard cell enriched epidermal peels from B. napus, in studies of metabolome responses to bicarbonate and elevated CO[2], respectively. Our identified metabolome had an overlap of 62 and 74 metabolites with those datasets, respectively (Supplemental Table [98]1). Our metabolome profile (390 metabolites; 225 of which were not previously identified in other guard cell metabolome profiling datasets^[99]12,[100]25,[101]26) thus significantly expands our knowledge regarding the metabolome of this specialized cell type. Identification of ABA-responsive metabolic signatures in B. napus GCPs B. napus GCPs were treated with ABA at a final concentration of 10 µM for 0 (i.e., untreated GCPs; results discussed above), 2, 15, or 60 min, respectively. Given that ethanol (EtOH, solvent control) did not regulate stomatal movement in B. napus (Fig. [102]1A) and no significant changes in metabolites caused by ethanol were detected in A. thaliana guard cells^[103]12, only GCPs treated with ethanol for 15 min were prepared in our experiment. Five replicates of each sample, i.e., 0 min, ABA 2 min, ABA 15 min, ABA 60 min, and EtOH 15 min, were prepared and analyzed on GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS in parallel. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that the 0 min and EtOH 15 min groups cluster together, whereas ABA treated groups are distinguished from 0 min and EtOH 15 min, indicating the ABA treatment as the major factor contributing to the cluster segregation (Supplemental Fig. [104]S2). To identify responsive metabolites, we imposed a threshold of p value ≤0.05 in Student’s t test and at least 20% in fold change^[105]38,[106]39. For these analyses, each treatment sample, i.e., ABA 2 min, ABA 15 min, ABA 60 min, and EtOH 15 min was compared to the 0 min sample. EtOH treatment for 15 min caused changes in only 12 metabolites, with 10, 1, and 1 identified from GC-MS/MS, LC-MS/MS positive mode, and LC-MS/MS negative mode, respectively (Supplemental Table [107]2). Eleven of these metabolites, for example, xylitol and palatinose, were also found in our ABA responsive dataset; these metabolites were not designated as ABA-regulated, due to their EtOH responsiveness. After combining the GC dataset with the two LC datasets, 17, 66, and 18 metabolites were found to be ABA responsive at time points 2 min, 15 min, and 60 min respectively, as compared to 0 min (Supplemental Table [108]2). The abundance changes of all these metabolites (77 unique metabolites in total) at different time points under ABA treatment are represented by heat maps (Fig. [109]3). None of these 77 metabolites was absent (i.e., no detection) in untreated (0 min) samples but present in ABA-treated samples, although some unidentified MS peaks appeared upon ABA treatment. Among the ABA responsive metabolites, 8, 27, and 48 metabolites were revealed by GC, LC positive mode, and LC negative mode, respectively. There was only one metabolite (galactinol) common to GC and LC negative mode, no metabolites common to GC and LC positive mode and only 5 metabolites common to LC positive mode and negative mode (5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-ribofuranosyl 5′-monophosphate, 2,3-diphosphoglycerate, 2′-deoxyadenosine-5′-monophosphate, S-lactoylglutathione, and kaempferol) (Supplemental Table [110]2), again illustrating the value of multiple analysis methods. The major groups of the ABA responsive metabolites were phenolics (mostly flavonoids), carbohydrates, terpenoids (mostly tetraterpenoids), sugar nucleosides/nucleotides, and sulfur-containing metabolites (Fig. [111]3 and Supplemental Table [112]2). Figure 3. [113]Figure 3 [114]Open in a new tab Primary (A) and secondary (B) metabolites responsive to ABA at different time points in B. napus GCPs. At 2, 15, and 60 min heat maps represent log2 of fold change, i.e., the log2-transformed metabolite abundance (peak area) at each time point divided by the level at 0 min; a 0 min column is also provided for comparison. All metabolites depicted were significantly changed at one or more time points (2 min, 15 min, and 60 min) of ABA treatment. Abbreviations: UDP: uridine diphosphate; AICAR: 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-ribofuranosyl. A pathway enrichment analysis was performed using all available KEGG IDs of the ABA responsive metabolites (58 out of 77) against the KEGG A. thaliana reference metabolome using MetaboAnalyst 3.0^[115]40. Figure [116]4 shows all identified pathways from pathway enrichment analysis, which assesses the over-representation of inquiry compounds in known pathways, and their pathway impact values from pathway topology analysis, which indicate the importance of the identified metabolites to that pathway^[117]41 (Supplemental Table [118]3). Enriched pathways with high impact include flavone and flavonol biosynthesis, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, and starch and sucrose metabolism (Fig. [119]4). Flavone and flavonol are two subgroups of flavonoids that are widely distributed secondary metabolites in higher plants^[120]42. The majority (15 out of 17) of the flavonoids were upregulated by ABA at 15 min (Fig. [121]5A and B; Supplemental Table [122]2). Sugar metabolism is also highly impacted by ABA treatment (Fig. [123]4). For example, an increase in sucrose and glucose 1-phosphate was observed in B. napus GCPs under ABA treatment (Fig. [124]3). Uridine 5′-diphosphate (UDP), UDP-glucose, and UDP-rhamnose also showed significant upregulation by ABA treatment (Fig. [125]3). Figure 4. Figure 4 [126]Open in a new tab Metabolic pathways affected by ABA treatment in guard cells revealed by pathway analysis. x axis represents the impact of the identified metabolites on the indicated pathway. y axis indicates the extent to which the designated pathway is enriched in the identified metabolites. Values were ascertained from MetaboAnalyst. Circle colors (see color scale for reference) indicate pathway enrichment significance. Circle size indicates pathway impact. Figure 5. [127]Figure 5 [128]Open in a new tab Abundance changes along the time course of ABA treatment for quercetin and quercetin derivatives (A), non-quercetin flavonoids (B), and glucosinolates (C). Metabolites 1–22 are: 1: quercetin-3-(6″-malonyl)-glucoside; 2: quercetin; 3: quercetin-3-arabinoside; 4: quercetin-3,4′-O-di-beta-glucopyranoside; 5: quercetin-4′-glucoside; 6: myricetin-3-galactoside; 7: kaempferol; 8: kaempferol-3-O-glucoside; 9: cyanidin-3,5-di-O-glucoside; 10: hesperetin; 11: isosakuranetin-7-O-neohesperidoside; 12: cyanidin-3-sophoroside; 13: hesperidin; 14: naringin; 15: cyanidin-3-O-galactoside; 16: 3-hydroxy-3′,4′,5′-trimethoxyflavone; 17: myricetin; 18: 7-methylthioheptyl glucosinolate; 19: 8-methylthiooctyl glucosinolate; 20: (2 R)−2-hydroxy-2-phenethylglucosinolate; 21: 4-methylsufinyl-3-butenyl glucosinolate. Solid data points indicate statistically significant changes upon ABA treatment (Student’s t test; p value < 0.05) compared to 0 min data. Effects of flavonoids, glucosinolates, and sterols in stomatal responses to ABA in A. thaliana and B. napus Multiple flavonoids were identified as ABA-responsive in B. napus guard cells (Supplemental Table [129]2, Fig. [130]3, and Fig. [131]5A and B), most of which were glycosylated, i.e., linked with a sugar moiety. Although such conjugated metabolites are generally presumed to be inactive^[132]43, one study found that flavonoid glycosides such as quercetin 3-O-glucoside and kaempferol 3-O-glucoside exhibit radical scavenging activities, a feature that would suppress ROS^[133]42, which are known to promote stomatal closure^[134]44,[135]45. We observed that quercetin and quercetin-3-(6″-malonyl)-glucoside were strongly induced by ABA (Fig. [136]5A). Two other quercetin derivatives, quercetin-3,4′-O-di-beta-glucopyranoside and quercetin-3-arabinoside were also induced while quercetin-4′-glucoside was slightly repressed (Fig. [137]5A and Supplemental Table [138]2). All of the other 12 non-quercetin related flavonoids were significantly induced by ABA treatment at 15 min except for myricetin (Fig. [139]5B and Supplemental Table [140]2). Based on the results of our large-scale metabolite analyses and previous observations^[141]46,[142]47, we hypothesized that the identified flavonoids would modulate stomatal movements. As a test of this hypothesis, we applied a non-glycosidic form of one of the strongly ABA-upregulated flavonoids, quercetin, to investigate its effect on stomatal movement and its regulation by ABA in A. thaliana. Based on quercetin measurement in the leaves of A. thaliana ^[143]47,[144]48, we estimated that in vivo quercetin concentration is close to 1 µM. In Arabidopsis leaves, application of 1 µM quercetin caused a slight increase in stomatal aperture compared to solvent control after 90 min treatment; however, without statistical significance (Fig. [145]6A). On the other hand, ABA-induced stomatal closure was opposed by 1 µM quercetin (Fig. [146]6A), suggesting an antagonistic role of quercetin in the ABA signaling pathway. A significant effect of quercetin was observed at 90 min, implying the interaction of quercetin with ABA either as a late stage signaling event or a sustained process. We also tested the effect of quercetin in B. napus leaf pieces. However, an antagonistic effect of quercetin in ABA (10 µM) -induced stomatal closure was not observed in B. napus even at concentrations up to 5 µM (Fig. [147]6B). The inconsistency of quercetin effect between the two species might be caused by species-dependent sensitivity to the metabolite tested. Figure 6. [148]Figure 6 [149]Open in a new tab Effects of quercetin, sinigrin, campesterol, and β-sitosterol on stomatal apertures in A. thaliana (A,C,E and G) and B. napus (B,D,F and H) leaves. Data are means ± standard errors of at least 4 independent replicates with 100 ± 5 stomata measured for each sample. Asterisks indicate a significant effect of addition of the secondary metabolite (Student’s t test; p < 0.05). Several glucosinolates were also found to be responsive to ABA in our guard cell metabolomes, with 7-methylthioheptyl glucosinolate and 8-methylthiooctyl glucosinolate significantly increasing after ABA treatment (Fig. [150]5C and Supplemental Table [151]2). The glucosinolate-myrosinase system is a defensive mechanism uniquely present in some plant families, including the Brassicaceae ^[152]49. Stomatal movement modulation by components in this system also has been recognized^[153]50–[154]52. To investigate glucosinolate regulation of stomatal movement, we applied an allyl-glucosinolate, sinigrin, separately or with ABA, to A. thaliana and B. napus leaves. Sinigrin is a naturally occurring metabolite in A. thaliana and B. napus, and is hydrolyzed by myrosinases into allyl isothiocyanate and allyl cyanide^[155]53,[156]54. Sinigrin-induced stomatal closure and an additive effect with 10 µM ABA in promotion of stomatal closure were observed with statistical significance in both A. thaliana (Fig. [157]6C) and B. napus (Fig. [158]6D). Several phytosterols (β-sitosterol, 5β-stigmastan-3b-ol, and campesterol) were downregulated in guard cells upon ABA treatment (Fig. [159]3 and Supplemental Table [160]2). We applied campesterol (2 µM), either separately or with ABA (10 µM), to A. thaliana and B. napus. In both species, an antagonistic effect of campesterol on ABA-induced stomatal closure was observed (Fig. [161]6E and F). The effect of another phytosterol, β-sitosterol was also tested in the ABA-induced stomatal closure of A. thaliana and B. napus. An antagonistic effect of β-sitosterol (5 µM) in ABA- induced stomatal closure was observed in B. napus (Fig. [162]6H) but not consistently in A. thaliana (Fig. [163]6G). Discussion Complementary GC-MS and LC-MS platforms together with simplified extraction enhances coverage in metabolome profiling Largely due to the differences in the ionization techniques and columns for molecule separation, GC-MS and LC-MS each exhibit detection biases for certain classes of metabolites. Temperature gradients for separation and electron ionization are commonly used in GC-MS, and primary metabolites, such as amino acids, carbohydrates, organic acids, and fatty acids are the main categories of metabolites detected with GC-MS^[164]33. LC-MS usually separates molecules based on their polarity and uses soft electrospray ionization, which in practice covers a wider range of metabolites, including plant secondary metabolite groups such as alkaloids, phenolics, and flavonoids^[165]33. These platform biases were also observed in our study: the majority of metabolites identified with GC-MS were primary metabolites whereas LC-MS analyses detected both primary and secondary metabolites (Fig. [166]2 and Supplemental Table [167]1). The three analysis conditions are complementary and overall 390 non-redundant metabolites were identified, making this dataset one of the largest to date for a plant single cell type^[168]22,[169]55. Ionization in LC-MS can generally be divided into positive mode, in which samples are protonated, and negative mode, in which samples are deprotonated. Typically, certain categories of metabolites can be preferentially resolved under a certain mode. For example, in our experiments, carotenoids were only detected under positive mode (Supplemental Table [170]1), mostly with the MS precursor in the radical cation form [M]*^+ rather than the protonated form [M + H]^+, a phenomenon that has been observed before^[171]56. On the other hand, more acids were identified under negative mode, which might be due to the prone-to-deprotonate feature of acids (Supplemental Table [172]1). Therefore, as previously known and as we observed in our study, no single analytical instrument is entirely robust to cover the whole metabolome profile. For broad coverage, it is necessary to utilize multiple platforms for metabolome profiling. In addition to the choice of the instrumentation platforms, the selection of the metabolite extraction protocol is another key factor that influences metabolome coverage. Practically, only a fraction of the entire metabolome can be resolved, in part depending on the composition of the extraction solution. For example, inclusion of chloroform in the extraction solvent was found to be counterproductive in an untargeted LC-MS metabolomics workflow^[173]33. Additionally, metabolites, even if successfully extracted, might not be detected by mass spectrometry due to failure to be dissolved by the loading buffer prior to the analysis. Therefore, an unbiased and efficient extraction protocol is critically important to successful metabolome profiling. Although responsive to stimuli, GCPs lack cell walls, and so can be easily disrupted for metabolite release. Accordingly, in this study metabolites were extracted from GCPs simultaneously with derivatization, including heating and shaking steps for GC-MS/MS analysis, and vortexing with loading buffer for LC-MS/MS analysis. This procedure dramatically reduced sample processing time and potential sample loss caused by transfers during extraction. Metabolite identification and annotation In the early days of mass spectrometry based metabolomics, m/z was used for identification, sometimes together with chromatographic retention time. A major disadvantage of this type of identification is that isomers and stereoisomers cannot be differentiated due to their identical mass and occasional co-elution on chromatography^[174]57. With the advent of tandem mass spectrometry, fragmentation patterns (MS/MS or MS^n) of a compound provide another important, and often defining, feature for metabolite identification^[175]58. Databases with mass spectral information are essential references for metabolomics