Abstract Human neurons function over an entire lifetime, yet the molecular mechanisms which perform their functions and protecting against neurodegenerative disease during aging are still elusive. Here, we conducted a systematic study on the human brain aging by using the weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) method to identify meaningful modules or representative biomarkers for human brain aging. Significantly, 19 distinct gene modules were detected based on the dataset [35]GSE53890; among them, six modules related to the feature of brain aging were highly preserved in diverse independent datasets. Interestingly, network feature analysis confirmed that the blue modules demonstrated a remarkably correlation with human brain aging progress. Besides, the top hub genes including PPP3CB, CAMSAP1, ACTR3B, and GNG3 were identified and characterized by high connectivity, module membership, or gene significance in the blue module. Furthermore, these genes were validated in mice of different ages. Mechanically, the potential regulators of blue module were investigated. These findings highlight an important role of the blue module and its affiliated genes in the control of normal brain aging, which may lead to potential therapeutic interventions for brain aging by targeting the hub genes. Keywords: normal brain aging, prefrontal cortical regions, transcriptomic, weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA), hub gene Introduction Brain aging is characterized by a progressive loss of physiological integrity including loss of gray and white matter volume, a general loss of dendritic spines, loss of synaptic plasticity, increased axonal bouton turnover rates, and elevated inflammation, leading to impaired function and increased vulnerability to neurodegenerative disease ([36]Salthouse, 2009; [37]Dorszewska, 2013; [38]Grillo et al., 2013; [39]Lopez-Otin et al., 2013). However, the systematic cellular mechanisms behind the normal brain aging phenotypic changes in the absence of neurodegenerative disease of healthy older adults are only barely understood. Inspiringly, precision medicine has emerged as a new approach to health care base on the individual’s molecular drivers of disease ([40]Montine and Montine, 2015). Therefore, applying this tailored and molecular mechanism-based approach to understand and reduce the negative impacts of brain aging are very promising. Even though recent reports have suggested the distinct changes in the expression of genes at the single neuron level ([41]Kadakkuzha et al., 2013), the systematic cellular mechanisms behind the normal brain aging phenotypic changes in the healthy older adults are only barely understood. One method to study molecular mechanisms of aging is the high-throughput technology. However, the biased process in large changes analysis of differential gene expression, as well as lacking the consideration of the relationship between changing genes as a whole are inevitable drawbacks for this method ([42]Furlong, 2013; [43]Lou et al., 2017). In order to explore the dynamic changes for understanding the system-level properties of normal brain aging progress in an unbiased manner, one network approach, named weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) is proposed. It can group functionally correlated genes into modules ([44]Langfelder and Horvath, 2008). These modules are constructed by calculating a correlation network analysis of large, high-dimensional datasets, which are based on pairwise correlations between genes due to their similar expression profile, and can correlate with different stages of clinical traits ([45]Langfelder and Horvath, 2008). The R package for WGCNA has been successfully applied in various biological contexts, e.g., cancer ([46]Heiland D. et al., 2017; [47]Sun et al., 2017), mouse genetics ([48]Savas et al., 2017), and analysis of brain imaging data ([49]Heiland D. H. et al., 2017), which can also be used to describe the correlation structure between gene expression profiles, image data, genetic marker data, proteomics data, and other high-dimensional data ([50]Langfelder and Horvath, 2008). The R package along with its source code and additional material are freely available at [51]https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/WGCNA/WGCNA.pdf. Even though, WGCNA approach has provided a comprehensive characterization of the transcriptomic changes for disease’s functional interpretation and led to new insights into the molecular aspects of clinical-pathological factors, there are very few reports applying WGCNA to identify gene co-expression networks associated with normal brain aging. To fulfill this gap, we conduct a WGCNA method by calculating module-trait correlations based on [52]GSE53890 public microarray dataset, which include 41 samples and 24,455 genes. This approach identifies six meaningful co-expression modules significantly related to normal brain aging and highly preserved in other brain aging datasets. Besides, hub genes contributing to normal brain aging are also verified. Herein, this paper is devoted to discovering novel gene signatures that greatly impact the progression of normal brain aging by WGCNA approach. Materials and Methods mRNA Expression Data First, the microarray-based expression dataset [53]GSE53890 provided by [54]Lu et al. (2014) was downloaded from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO^[55]1). This dataset contained quantile normalized genome-wide expression profiles of adult human brain samples from prefrontal cortical regions, including samples from 12 young (<40 years), 9 middle aged (40–70 years), 16 normal aged (70–94 years), and 4 extremely aged (95–106 years). And these postmortem brain tissue samples used in this study were neuropathologically normal for age, and were derived from non-demented individuals (Supplementary File [56]1, Table S16). The dataset was produced using Affymetrix Human Genome U133 plus 2.0 arrays, which allowed the expression analysis of over 47,000 transcripts. The other microarray datasets referenced during the study ([57]GSE1572, [58]GSE71620, [59]GSE30272, [60]GSE21779, and [61]GSE11882) were also available in the public repository from NCBI GEO datasets. All the other datasets supporting the findings of this study were available within the article and provided it as Supplementary File [62]2, Table S1. For the public datasets, its detailed experimental methods and descriptions could be found in the original references. Notably, only the human normal brain aging samples