Abstract Objective A study was conducted to identify metabolic biochemical differences between two chicken genotypes infected with Eimeria acervulina and to ascertain the underlying mechanisms for these metabolic alterations and to further delineate genotype-specific effects during merozoite formation and oocyst shedding. Methods Fourteen day old chicks of an unimproved (ACRB) and improved (COBB) genotype were orally infected with 2.5 x 10^5 sporulated E. acervulina oocysts. At 4 and 6 day-post infection, 5 birds from each treatment group and their controls were bled for serum. Global metabolomic profiles were assessed using ultra performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (metabolon, Inc.,). Statistical analyses were based on analysis of variance to identify which biochemicals differed significantly between experimental groups. Pathway enrichment analysis was conducted to identify significant pathways associated with response to E. acervulina infection. Results A total of 752 metabolites were identified across genotype, treatment and time post infection. Altered fatty acid (FA) metabolism and β-oxidation were identified as dominant metabolic signatures associated with E. acervulina infection. Key metabolite changes in FA metabolism included stearoylcarnitine, palmitoylcarnitine and linoleoylcarnitine. The infection induced changes in nucleotide metabolism and elicited inflammatory reaction as evidenced by changes in thromboxane B2, 12-HHTrE and itaconate. Conclusions Serum metabolome of two chicken genotypes infected with E. acervulina demonstrated significant changes that were treatment-, time post-infection- and genotype-dependent. Distinct metabolic signatures were identified in fatty acid, nucleotide, inflammation and oxidative stress biochemicals. Significant microbial associated product alterations are likely to be associated with malabsorption of nutrients during infection. Introduction Eimeria spp. are apicomplexan parasites that share many metabolic pathways with their animal hosts [[32]1]. The genus Eimeria is the largest of the Eimeriidae family and is responsible for coccidiosis disease in poultry with global economic losses in excess of $3 billion annually [[33]2]. Upon ingestion by a host, the parasite undergoes a period of asexual reproduction (schizogony) resulting in the production of merozoites which proceeds to a sexual reproduction phase (gametogony) producing macro- and micro-gametocytes. Fertilization of gametocytes is followed by the formation of oocysts which are shed in the feces [[34]3]. Eimeria spp. exhibit a high degree of host and site specificity in the gastrointestinal tract, as well as distinct morphology of oocyst and pathogenic effects [[35]4]. The most common parasite species found in chickens are Eimeria (E.) acervulina, E. maxima and E. tenella and they are usually localized in the lower duodenum and upper ileum, mid-ileum near the Meckel’s diverticulum, and caeca, respectively [[36]4,[37]5]. Infection of meat-type chickens (broilers) is often characterized by weight loss, poor feed utilization efficiency, intestinal lesions, diarrhea and ultimately death, depending on the degree of pathogenesis [[38]2,[39]6]. Efficient control of coccidiosis therefore requires rapid and accurate detection and identification of the Eimeria spp, however, current diagnosis of infection relies heavily upon post-mortem site specific enteric lesions and observed morphological characteristics during necropsy [[40]4,[41]7,[42]8]. Eimeria spp. infection has been identified as one of the predisposing factors of necrotic enteritis in poultry [[43]2–[44]5], therefore control of coccidiosis in poultry is paramount in the control of other enteric disease. Although DNA-based techniques for diagnosis using oocysts in fecal samples have been reported, there are differences in the sensitivity and specificity in detecting different Eimeria spp. [[45]9–[46]11]. Progress in omic science has led to significant improvement in the understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms that underlie several disease pathologies. Metabolomics is increasingly being used in biomarker discovery, characterization of metabolites and metabolic changes, and development of specific biochemical fingerprints (signatures) for different cellular processes [[47]12,[48]13]. Continuous advances in omics will undoubtedly lead to the development of better diagnostic tools and the discovery of new therapeutics for efficient control of coccidiosis and other diseases in chickens and other species. Despite the large body of work exploring the metabolome in several species, there has been no comprehensive study of the metabolome of chickens infected with Eimeria spp. We hypothesized that infecting different chicken genotypes with E. acervulina could identify metabolic changes that are likely to be mechanistically involved in the host infection response. We further assessed the metabolomic alterations at two time points (merozoite formation and oocyst shedding) post infection and ascertained genetic background-specific changes and effects. Materials and methods All protocols were approved by the University of Georgia Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. This research was conducted according to the guidelines approved by the institutional animal care and use committee of the University of Georgia. Two hundred and eighty male chicks comprising of equal numbers of Athens Canadian Random Bred (ACRB) and Cobb500 (COBB) genotypes were raised under standard husbandry practices in coccidian free rooms from hatch until 14 days of age. The ACRB is an unselected control population established in 1955 and has been compared with the modern commercial broiler in several studies. An extensive review of the history and comparative studies involving the ACRB has been previously published [[49]14]. Cobb 500 is a commercial meat-type strain developed by Cobb Vantress Inc., in 1983. Although originally selected for breast meat, the Cobb 500 has been continuously selected for feed efficiency and growth [[50]15]. At 14 days of age, the chicks were randomly assigned to 4 treatments groups in a 2 x 2 factorial design, with 7 replicates per treatment, and 10 birds per replicate. The treatment effects (TX) consisted of bird genotypes (ACRB or COBB) and two infection levels (oral gavage of 2.5 x 10^5 sporulated E. acervulina oocysts or distilled water (CTRL)). Birds were fed on a standard non-medicated grower diet, containing 20% crude protein and 12.92 MJ/kg metabolizable energy. Feed and water were provided ad libitum throughout the experiment. Birds were monitored twice a day for any adverse clinical signs. At 4 and 6 days post infection (dpi), 5 birds from each treatment group were randomly sampled and bled according to the University of Georgia animal care protocol. Serum from the blood samples was stored at -86°C. All birds were individually weighed at 0, 4, 6 and 7 dpi. Metabolome profiling of chicken serum Sample preparation The serum metabolomic quantification was performed by Metabolon, Inc. (Durham, NC, USA). The samples were deproteinized by dissociating small molecules bound to protein or trapped in the precipitated protein matrix by precipitating with methanol under vigorous shaking for 2 minutes (Glen Mills GenoGrinder 2000) followed by centrifugation. The resulting extract was divided into five fractions for four different ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) methods: (1) two fractions were analyzed by two separate reverse phase (RP)/UPLC-MS/MS methods with positive ion mode electrospray ionization (ESI); (2) one for analysis by RP/UPLC-MS/MS with negative ion mode ESI; (3) one fraction for analysis by HILIC/UPLC-MS/MS with negative ion mode ESI, and (4) one fraction was reserved for backup. Samples were placed briefly in a TurboVap® (Zymark, Palo Alto, CA, USA) to remove the organic solvent. The sample extracts were stored overnight under nitrogen before preparation for analysis. Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy (UPLC-MS/MS) For all the methods, a Waters ACQUITY ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive high resolution/accurate mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization (HESI-II) source and Orbitrap mass analyzer operated at 35,000 mass resolution was used. To ensure injection and chromatography consistency, sample extracts were dried and reconstituted in solvents compatible to each of the four methods. (A): the first aliquot was analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, chromatographically optimized for more hydrophilic compounds. Using this method, the extract was gradient eluted from a C18 column (Waters UPLC BEH C18-2.1x100 mm, 1.7 μm) using water and methanol, containing 0.05% perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPA) and 0.1% formic acid (FA). (B): the second aliquot was also analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions, however it was chromatographically optimized for more hydrophobic compounds. The extract was gradient eluted from the same aforementioned C18 column using methanol, acetonitrile, water, 0.05% PFPA and 0.01% FA and was operated at an overall higher organic content. (C): the third aliquot was analyzed using basic negative ion optimized conditions with a separate dedicated C18 column. The basic extracts were gradient eluted from the column using methanol and water, however with 6.5mM Ammonium Bicarbonate at pH 8. (D): the fourth aliquot was analyzed via negative ionization following elution from a HILIC column (Waters UPLC BEH Amide 2.1x150 mm, 1.7 μm) using a gradient consisting of water and acetonitrile with 10mM Ammonium Formate, pH 10.8. The MS analysis varied between MS and data-dependent MS^n scans using dynamic exclusion. The scan ranged was from 70 to 1000 m/z. Bioinformatics Raw data files were stored at the Metabolon Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). The data was extracted and analyzed using peak-identification software. The software has data processing tools for quality control and compound identification, and a collection of information interpretation and visualization tools. Metabolites were identified using Metabolon library which is based on authenticated standards that contain the retention time/index (RI), mass to charge ratio (m/z), and chromatographic data (including MS/MS spectral data) on all molecules present in the library using software developed at Metabolon [[51]16,[52]17]. Over 3,300 commercially available purified standard compounds are registered into LIMS for analysis on all platforms for determination of their analytical characteristics. Area-under-the-curve was used to identify peaks. Whenever necessary, the data was normalized to account for differences in metabolite levels due to differences in the amount of material present in each sample. Data was log transformed and missing values were imputated using the minimum observed value for each compound ([53]S1 Table). Statistical analyses Statistical analysis was based on a model that included the main effects of genotype, treatment and time post infection and their interaction using ArrayStudio ([54]www.omicsoft.com/array-studio). Analysis of variance contrasts were used to identify biochemicals that differed significantly between experimental groups. Statistically significant (p<0.5), as well as those approaching significance (0.05