Abstract Simple Summary Maintaining the energy stability is critical for cell surviving and adapting in a vagary environment. Glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) are two major energy production pathways in cells. Here we demonstrated that menin regulates the expression of OXPHOS and glycolytic genes, and this regulation can further be modified by a group of menin-associated proteins (MAPs) including KMT2A, MED12, WAPL, and GATA3. Downregulation of menin and MAP genes altered the proportion of glycolysis and OXPHOS for energy generation, and we found a counteracting function of menin and MAPs when the shRNA knockdown cells are exposed to metabolic stress. Menin and MAPs may serve as transcriptional sensors for balancing the preference between glycolysis and OXPHOS. This coordinated regulation is crucial for cell adaption to stressful microenvironments using different pathways for energy production. Abstract The interplay between glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) is central to maintain energy homeostasis. It remains to be determined whether there is a mechanism governing metabolic fluxes based on substrate availability in microenvironments. Here we show that menin is a key transcription factor regulating the expression of OXPHOS and glycolytic genes in cancer cells and primary tumors with poor prognosis. A group of menin-associated proteins (MAPs), including KMT2A, MED12, WAPL, and GATA3, is found to restrain menin’s full function in this transcription regulation. shRNA knockdowns of menin and MAPs result in reduced ATP production with proportional alterations of cellular energy generated through glycolysis and OXPHOS. When shRNA knockdown cells are exposed to metabolic stress, the dual functionality can clearly be distinguished among these metabolic regulators. A MAP can negatively counteract the regulatory mode of menin for OXPHOS while the same protein positively influences glycolysis. A close-proximity interaction between menin and MAPs allows transcriptional regulation for metabolic adjustment. This coordinate regulation by menin and MAPs is necessary for cells to rapidly adapt to fluctuating microenvironments and to maintain essential metabolic functions. Keywords: menin, menin-associated proteins, oxidative phosphorylation, glycolysis, circulating tumor cells 1. Introduction Menin encoded by the MEN1 gene is a multifaceted protein participating in a variety of cellular functions [[46]1]. Earlier studies revealed that germline mutations accompanied by somatic alterations of MEN1 lead to the development of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 in endocrine glands [[47]2]. Through a two-hit mechanism, this tumor-suppressor inactivation has also been observed in lung, breast, and gastrointestinal cancers [[48]3,[49]4,[50]5]. Although MEN1 is well recognized as a classical tumor-suppressor gene, subsequent studies found aberrant upregulation of the gene in solid tumors and leukemias [[51]6,[52]7]. The gene product, menin, appears to interact with oncoproteins to promote transcription programs for cellular transformation and proliferation [[53]8,[54]9]. In particular, menin forms a complex with KMT2A (formerly MLL1) or other family proteins to activate gene transcription via histone methylation and deacetylation in solid tumors [[55]10,[56]11]. Recent findings indicated that menin collaborates with hormone signaling involved in the progression of breast and prostate cancers [[57]10,[58]12]. Indeed, the initial evidence points to complex regulatory roles of menin in response to different physiological conditions [[59]13]. A growing body of studies has now implicated that menin acts as a transcriptional driver, engaging in two regulatory events for tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing activities, respectively [[60]13,[61]14]. To do so, menin must interact with different factors to specify the active or suppressive mode for regulating gene transcription. Biochemical and crystal structural analyses revealed that menin is a scaffold protein providing multiple docking sites for transcriptional machinery components [[62]1,[63]14,[64]15]. Further studies found that menin individually cooperates with oncogenic signaling components, including TGF-β/SMDAs, NFκB, β-catenin, estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), and an androgen receptor, for transcriptional modulation of downstream targets responsible for cellular transformation and proliferation, DNA replication and repair, chromatin modification, and hormone resistance [[65]9,[66]12,[67]16,[68]17,[69]18]. While these studies give insights into a multifaceted role of menin in oncogenesis, it is still a challenge to know how menin interacts with diverse protein partners in cancer cells responding to different microenvironments. To this end, we combined RNA-seq transcriptomic profiles, BioID protein–protein interactions [[70]19], and in silico correlation comparisons to investigate crucial functions of menin in breast cancer cells. The rationale was that menin had been implicated as a proliferative determinant during breast tumorigenesis [[71]10]. In addition to confirming a role of menin in ERα-modulated signaling [[72]10,[73]18], our integrated analysis identified a group of menin-associated proteins (MAPs) for transcriptional regulation of genes involved in metabolic energy pathways, including glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) [[74]20]. As a positive modulator, menin interacts with a MAP for metabolic regulation in a context-dependent manner. Whereas a MAP negatively influences OXPHOS, the same protein may positively regulate glycolysis. Furthermore, we set out to demonstrate that close-proximity interactions between these proteins are essential for the coregulation of metabolic gene transcription in response to microenvironmental changes. 2. Results 2.1. Gene Transcription of Energy Metabolism Pathways Modulated by MEN1 Increased MEN1 expression was found in primary breast tumors relative to normal controls in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort (p < 0.001, [75]Figure S1A). The upregulation was positively associated with elevated MEN1 copy-numbers (p < 0.0001, [76]Figure S1B). In addition, patients with ERα-positive tumors that displayed high expression levels or elevated copy-numbers of MEN1 appeared to have poor prognosis ([77]Figure S1C,D). To further investigate how this aberrant expression contributes to tumorigenesis, we performed an RNA-seq analysis of MEN1 shRNA knockdown in two ERα-positive breast cancer cell lines T47D and MCF-7, respectively ([78]Figure 1A,B). Differentially expressed genes (i.e., fold change ≥1.5 and ≤0.66 for upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively, from two biological repeats) were identified in both shRNA knockdown cells relative to vehicle controls. Although the knockdown efficiencies (i.e., 88–95% at the RNA level and 40–60% at the protein level) were comparable in both cell lines, more differentially expressed genes were observed in T47D knockdown cells than in MCF-7 knockdown cells ([79]Figure 1C). The gene set enrichment analysis also reflected more notable impacts of menin on signaling transduction pathways in T47D cells relative to MCF-7 cells ([80]Figure 1D). Consistent with a previous finding [[81]10], the pathway analysis confirmed a role of menin in regulating ERα signaling in breast cancer cells. Surprisingly, we found that metabolic energy pathways were the most affected by MEN1 knockdown ([82]Figure 1D,E). In particular, the MEN1 knockdown had a greater influence on genes encoding structural components and regulatory functions for glycolysis and OXPHOS ([83]Figure 1F). The RT-qPCR analysis of 16 representative genes involved in glycolysis and in two mitochondrial electron transport chains (i.e., OXPHOS complexes I and II) further confirmed the robustness of RNA-seq data ([84]Figure 1G). Collectively, the results find a previously unknown role of menin in regulating metabolic energy pathways. Figure 1. [85]Figure 1 [86]Open in a new tab Identification of MEN1-modulated genes in breast cancer cells. (A) RT-qPCR of MEN1 in T47D or MCF-7 cells treated with vehicle or MEN1 shRNA lentivirus (n = 3). (B) Quantitative Western immunoassays (WES) of menin expression in T47D or MCF-7 cells treated with vehicle or MEN1 shRNA lentivirus (n = 3). (C) Venn diagrams of differentially expressed genes (fold change ≥1.5 or ≤0.66) in T47D or MCF-7 cells after shMEN1 knockdown compared with vehicle controls (n = 2). (D) Pathway annotation analysis of MEN1-upregulated and MEN1-downregulated genes in T47D or MCF-7 cells using DAVID including cancer hallmark pathways. (E) Schematic illustration of five major metabolic pathways. (F) Expression heat maps of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and glycolytic genes in both MEN1 knockdown T47D and MCF-7 cells (fold changes relative to vehicle controls). (G) Bar charts of the expression levels of representative OXPHOS and glycolytic genes affected by MEN1 knockdown in T47D or MCF-7 cells using RT-qPCR. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for statistics. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. 2.2. Energy Metabolism Genes Coregulated by Menin and Menin-Associated Proteins in Primary Tumors As menin is a putative metabolic regulator, we postulated that this protein acts as a crucial component of a transcription complex to bind or interact with other factors for gene regulation. Therefore, we used a proximity-based biotin labeling technique or BioID to identify menin-associated proteins (MAPs) in T47D and MCF-7 cells ([87]Figure S2A; details in Methods). Proteins within a 10 nm radial proximity of ligase-fused menin were biotinylated in breast cancer cells transduced with doxycycline-inducible BirA-menin in the presence of biotin and doxycycline, and the labeled proteins were pulled down by streptavidin-beads ([88]Figure 2A,B) [[89]19,[90]21]. Analysis of liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy (LC–MS/MS) on biotinylated proteins identified 248 and 132 putative nuclear MAPs in T47D and MCF-7 cells, respectively ([91]Figure 2C). Based on known functions, MAPs were categorized into eight groups involved in basal transcription, DNA repair, mRNA modeling, nuclear scaffolding, site-specific transcription, cohesin complexes, and histone modification ([92]Table S1). Of the 35 MAPs shared by T47D and MCF-7 cells, ten were detectable even in control cells without biotin added, suggesting the presence of low endogenous biotin and probably their strong interactions with menin ([93]Figure 2D). The spatial nearness of individual MAPs to menin was estimated according to biotinylated protein quantities ([94]Figure 2E; [95]Figure S2B). To check the robustness of BioID findings, capillary Western immunoassays (WES) were conducted on nuclear and cytoplasmic lysates of T47D and MCF-7 cells, respectively, using specific antibodies against menin and four representative MAPs—KMT2A, MED12, WAPL, and GATA3 ([96]Figure 2F). The assays confirmed the association of these MAPs with menin was predominant in the nuclei, implicating their partnership with menin in gene regulation. Figure 2. [97]Figure 2 [98]Open in a new tab Identification of menin-associated proteins (MAPs) in breast cancer cells. (A) and (B) WES of BirA-Menin fusion proteins (A) and biotin-labeled proteins (B) in total lysates of BirA-MEN1 BioID engineered T47D or MCF-7 cells after incubating with or without doxycycline and biotin. (C) Schematic purification and proteomic identification of MAPs using LC–MS/MS. (D) Heatmap of the quantification of 35 MAPs commonly shared in T47D and MCF-7 cells. MAPs further verified by WES immunoassays were indicated by arrows. (E) Network analysis of 35 MAPs in MCF-7 cells. The distance between menin and MAPs represented the quantitative ratio of each MAP and menin. MAPs marked in blue were further assayed by WES. (F) Nuclear or cytoplasmic lysates of BirA-MEN1 BioID engineered T47D or MCF-7 cells after streptavidin beads pull-down were detected by WES with antibodies against menin, KMT2A, MED12, WAPL, GATA3, LaminA/C, or GAPDH. FL, full length; SP, spliced form. We further performed an in silico analysis of chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) data using anti-menin and anti-KMT2A [[99]10]. The menin and KMT2A binding sites are localized in the proximity of promoters and gene bodies of representative glycolysis and OXPHOS genes, suggesting a transcription regulatory role of menin and KMTs on these genes ([100]Figure S2C,D). Some of the menin and KMT2A binding sites are colocalized in some regions of gene loci. These confirm that menin and KMT2A are closely associated and likely coregulate these energy metabolism genes. Since the role of MAPs in controlling energy metabolism remains to be explored, we sought to determine the coexpression relationship between menin/MAP genes and OXPHOS/glycolytic genes. In silico analysis generated pairwise expression correlation heatmaps in 1031 primary breast tumors and 98 normal controls of the TCGA cohort ([101]Figure 3A,B; [102]Figure S3A,B). We observed that expression of MEN1 was moderately negatively correlated (r = −0.22) with the mean OXPHOS gene expression in normal controls but both turned to being positively correlated (r = 0.35) as they progressed into malignant tumors ([103]Figure 3C). In contrast, increased expression of three MAP genes—KMT2A, MED12, and WAPL—showed strong negative correlation with OXPHOS expression in both tumors and controls while GATA3 exhibited no correlation. It is notable that the expression of MEN1 was also positively correlated with that of glycolytic genes, although to a lesser degree than OXPHOS genes ([104]Figure 3D). There was no expression correlation between glycolytic genes and KMT2A, MED12, or WAPL, except for GATA3 showing a weak negative association. Next, we determined the coexpression relationship between MAP genes and MEN1 in primary tumors that were divided into four groups based on median expression levels: 1: high (above the median value) MAP and low (below the median value) MEN1; 2: high MAP and high MEN1; 3: low MAP and low MEN1; and 4: low MAP and high MEN1 ([105]Figure 3E and [106]Figure S3C). A trend of increased mean expression of OXPHOS genes (complex I-V) could be observed from Group 1 to 4. For example, high KMT2A and low MEN1 expressed tumors (Group 1) displayed lowest OXPHOS expression. In contrast, tumors with a reverse expression pattern of KMT2A and MEN1 (Group 4) had the highest OXPHOS expression ([107]Figure 3—left panel). Based on the data here and the forementioned menin1 as a positive regulator for OXPHOS gene expression, KMT2A seems to suppress MEN1 function. This negative regulation was also seen between MEN1 and two other MAP genes (MED12 and WAPL, [108]Figure 3E—middle two panels), but was not evident for GATA3. However, the negative coexpression relationship of MEN1 and three MAPs was not observed for glycolytic gene expression in the Group 1–4 tumors. Overall, the in silico analysis suggests an essential role of menin in upregulating cancer energy metabolism and the three MAPs may counteract menin, particularly in the transcription of OXPHOS genes. Figure 3. [109]Figure 3 [110]Open in a new tab Expression correlation relationship of menin/MAPs genes and OXPHOS/glycolytic genes. (A) Workflow of the in silico correlation analysis of gene expression in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer cohort. (B) Heatmaps of the expression correlation between MEN1/selected 4 MAP genes and OXPHOS genes (upper) or glycolytic genes (lower) in normal (N) and tumor (T) samples. The genes are arranged from the highest to the lowest according to gene expression correlation coefficients of MEN1–OXPHOS genes or MEN1–glycolytic genes in breast tumors. (C) and (D) Scatter plots and linear regression analyses of MEN1/selected MAPs expression and mean expression of OXPHOS genes (C) or glycolytic genes (D) in normal and tumor samples. (E) Violin plots (lower panel) shows the average expressions of the genes of OXPHOS complexes I-V and glycolysis in the samples of each of the corresponding 4 groups are shown as violin plots. Based on the median values (where ≥median is “high” and 0 was considered as amplification, while <0 as deletion. ChIP-seq data was obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO number [196]GSE85317) [[197]10] and used EaSeq to analyze and generate peaks. 4.12. Data Availability The RNA-seq data in this study is available through the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession number [198]GSE145955. 5. Conclusions In conclusion, we demonstrated that menin has a previously uncharacterized role in metabolic energy arbitration, in addition to modulating DNA replication and repair and cellular transformation [[199]45,[200]46]. The mode of menin-regulated transcription can further be adjusted by a group of MAPs. We propose that MAPs are transcriptional sensors to determine a preference between glycolysis and OXPHOS. Upstream metabolic signaling modulators (e.g., MYC, PGC-1α, AMPK, HIF-1α, mTOR, and RAS) [[201]8,[202]30,[203]32,[204]47,[205]48] may synergize with menin and MAPs for transcription modulation. To fuel energy for proliferation and differentiation, this coordinate regulation is essential for cells to assess available sources (i.e., oxygen, glucose, or free amino acid) for ATP generation. Acknowledgments