Abstract Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant head and neck cancer type with high morbidity in Southeast Asia, however the pathogenic mechanism of this disease is poorly understood. Using integrative pharmacogenomics, we find that NPC subtypes maintain distinct molecular features, drug responsiveness, and graded radiation sensitivity. The epithelial carcinoma (EC) subtype is characterized by activations of microtubule polymerization and defective mitotic spindle checkpoint related genes, whereas sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) and mixed sarcomatoid-epithelial carcinoma (MSEC) subtypes exhibit enriched epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and invasion promoting genes, which are well correlated with their morphological features. Furthermore, patient-derived organoid (PDO)-based drug test identifies potential subtype-specific treatment regimens, in that SC and MSEC subtypes are sensitive to microtubule inhibitors, whereas EC subtype is more responsive to EGFR inhibitors, which is synergistically enhanced by combining with radiotherapy. Through combinational chemoradiotherapy (CRT) screening, effective CRT regimens are also suggested for patients showing less sensitivity to radiation. Altogether, our study provides an example of applying integrative pharmacogenomics to establish a personalized precision oncology for NPC subtype-guided therapies. Subject terms: Cancer, Drug screening, Preclinical research, Translational research, Oncology __________________________________________________________________ Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant cancer type with high morbidity in Asia, and its current molecular classification is insufficient to predict therapy outcomes. Here the authors explore NPC subtype-specific response to therapy with a pharmacogenomics strategy integrating genomics and drug response of patient-derived organoids. Introduction Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a type of malignant tumor that is commonly found in specific geographical locations including Southeast Asia, North Africa, southern provinces of China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan^[68]1–[69]3. In 2015, 60,600 new NPC cases were identified, and 34,100 patients died in China^[70]4. Many risk factors are involved in NPC, including environmental factors, Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection, smoking, diet, and personal lifestyle of peoples, etc.^[71]5, yet how these factors contribute to NPC formation is poorly understood. Genomic variations and familial risks are other important causes for NPC, with more young people being affected by NPC than other cancer types^[72]6. Unlike other head and neck cancers, the asymptomatic nature of NPC is a major challenge, which hinders the early diagnosis of this disease. Therefore, many patients are diagnosed at advanced stages, which reduces the patient’s overall survival (OS)^[73]6,[74]7. Earlier studies proposed an array of genetic factors and genetic aberrations leading to the development of NPC, including NF-κB pathway activating mutations, chromatin modification-related mutations, ERBB-PI3K signaling activating mutations, etc.^[75]5,[76]8–[77]11. However, many questions, such as those regarding the major causative factors, the key driving pathways, druggable genetic targets in NPC, especially in different histological subtypes, are still unanswered clearly. According to the current World Health Organization (WHO) classification system, NPC is classified into three major histological subtypes: keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (KSCC), non-keratinizing carcinoma, and basaloid squamous cell carcinoma. Non-keratinizing tumors are further subcategorized as non-keratinizing undifferentiated carcinoma (NKUC) and non-keratinizing differentiated carcinoma (NKDC)^[78]12. Although the WHO subtype system is the most common form of NPC clinical classification, an increasing number of clinicians realize that the current WHO classification is insufficient for predicting chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) outcomes^[79]13,[80]14. The prognosis does not differ significantly between NKUC and NKDC, which are the two major subtypes of NPC and account for ~95% of all cases in China^[81]13. A new prognostic histopathologic classification system of NPC has emerged that classifies NPC into four subtypes based on morphologic characteristics: epithelial carcinoma (EC), sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC), mixed sarcomatoid-epithelial carcinoma (MSEC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and these NPC subtypes could be linked to prognosis^[82]13. However, further information about the genomic features and therapeutic response among different subtypes is worthy of investigation. RT is established as the definitive treatment for nonmetastatic NPC at an early stage, which leads to favorable clinical and survival outcomes with a 5-year OS rate of 87.3–93%, for stage I NPC patients^[83]15–[84]18. However, due to the intrinsic invasiveness and asymptomatic nature of the disease, the majority of NPC patients (60–70%) are diagnosed at an advanced stage, with local spread or regional lymph node metastasis^[85]5. For NPC patients with recurrent/metastatic tumor, the outcome is very poor, with a median OS of ~20 months^[86]19, and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard-of-care treatment at this stage as recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (v2.2018). If the cancer cells have spread to distant organs, chemotherapy is the only option^[87]19,[88]20. The commonly used chemotherapeutics for treating NPC includes cisplatin, fluorouracil, docetaxel, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, capecitabine, irinotecan, doxorubicin, vinorelbine, carboplatin and oxaliplatin. Several studies have indicated that CRT can significantly improve therapeutic outcome compared with RT alone^[89]21,[90]22. To investigate new strategies identifying the personalized optimal CRT and chemotherapy regimens is promising to improve the prognosis of NPC patients. Furthermore, since only a few chemical drugs have been approved for NPC, to explore more therapeutic drugs that can be used for the treatment of NPC is necessary. Recent studies have employed the patient-derived organoid (PDO) culture system for drug screening against various cancers, including breast^[91]23, colorectal^[92]24, gastric^[93]25, gastrointestinal^[94]26, prostate^[95]27, esophageal^[96]28, liver^[97]29, pancreatic^[98]30, and bladder cancers^[99]31 etc. Vlachogiannis et al., had demonstrated the good potential of this system to accurately predict the clinical responses of cancer drugs using organoids derived from metastatic, heavily pretreated colorectal and gastroesophageal cancer patients. Their data indicated that the PDOs showed as high as 88% positive predictive value and 100% negative predictive value in cancer patients^[100]26. Similar high accuracy in predicting clinical outcomes were also revealed by other studies^[101]32–[102]34. In this study, to explore the application of the PDO system in screening chemotherapy drugs that could be used alone or in CRT for NPC, we have conducted a pharmacogenomics-based precision medicine approach by integrating genomics with a drug sensitivity test on PDOs to comprehensively investigate effective regimens for individual patients. Our integrative approach uncovers potential subtype-related and patient-specific strategies for the use of drugs and CRT combinations against this deadly disease. Results Clinical information and histological subtyping of NPCs A total of 106 NPC tumors were collected from the hospital with routine records (Supplementary Table [103]1; Supplementary Data [104]1, [105]2), and we further studied their histological features. All NPC patients were of Chinese origin with a median diagnosed age of 48 years. EBV status was examined on 40 tumor samples, the results indicated that 36 samples showed strongly positive, and 4 samples were low positive (Supplementary Data [106]1). With characterization on WHO subtypes, 73.58% tumors were NKUC, 23.58% were NKDC, and 2.83% were KSCC (Supplementary Table [107]1; Supplementary Data [108]1). Based on the standard of the new NPC classification system^[109]13, all tumors were classified into four subtypes: (1) epithelial carcinoma (EC) (57/106, 53.77%), which is mainly composed of morphologically round epithelial cells; (2) sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) (20/106, 18.87%), which contains large proportions of spindle sarcomatoid cells; (3) mixed sarcomatoid-epithelial carcinoma (MSEC) (26/106, 24.53%), which shares both features of EC and SC; and (4) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (3/106, 2.83%), which is characterized by keratinizing phenotype that is rarely found in other subtypes (Fig. [110]1a). More percent of distant metastasis was diagnosed in SC subtype patients (35%) than in EC subtype patients (12.28%) (Supplementary Data [111]1). Fig. 1. Histological and molecular landscape of NPC subtypes. [112]Fig. 1 [113]Open in a new tab a Representative histological view of four NPC subtypes. The EC subtype is characterized by round epithelial tumor cells, while the SC subtype is characterized by spindle sarcomatoid tumor cells. The MSEC subtype encompasses both round epithelial and spindle sarcomatoid tumor cells. SCC is a minor subtype of NPC characterized by a keratinizing phenotype. Scale bar, 100 μm. The H&E staining images are representatives of 106 tumors consist of 57 EC subtype, 20 SC subtype, 26 MSEC subtype, and 3 SCC subtype tumors. b Immunohistochemical staining of NPC markers. The EC subtype is positive for the epithelial cell marker AE1/3 and negative for the sarcomatoid cell marker vimentin, whereas the SC subtype is positive for the sarcomatoid cell marker vimentin and negative to epithelial cell marker AE1/3. The MSEC subtype exhibited mixed pattern of both epithelial and sarcomatoid cell markers. Scale bar, 100 μm. The immunohistochemical images are representatives of 31 tumors consist of 12 EC subtype, 9 MSEC subtype, 7 SC subtype, and 3 SCC subtype tumors. c Summary table of NPC marker expression levels among subtypes. The top panel shows levels of AE1/3 positive cells in EC (n = 12), MSEC (n = 9), SC (n = 7), and SCC (n = 3) tumors. The bottom panel presents levels of vimentin-positive cells in EC (n = 12), MSEC (n = 9), SC (n = 7), and SCC (n = 3) tumors. The corresponding immunohistochemical images are demonstrated in Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. [114]1a. d Top recurrent protein coding SNVs identified from this cohort and represented in pathway wise, including cell cycle, NF-κB signaling, receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), chromatin remodeling, apoptosis, microtubule polymerization, mitosis regulation, DNA repair and EMT/invasion. SNV mutational rate for each tumor is shown at the top of the panel. Information of subtype, sample type, WHO subtype, gender, age of diagnosis, tumor stage, node classification, metastasis and smoking status are shown at the bottom. Only paired tumor samples (n = 88) were assigned for SNV identification. e Detailed somatic variation types and amounts discovered from this NPC cohort. A total of 2662 somatic mutations included 2306 missense mutations, 191 nonsense mutations, 47 splice site, 51 frame shift deletion, 31 in frame deletion, 23 frame shift insertion, 8 in frame insertion, and 5 others (n = 88 tumors). f Overall mutational signature of this NPC cohort revealed C > A and C > T base substitutions are predominant mutational signature in NPC (n = 88 tumors). Next, we conducted the immunofluorescence assay using several antibodies against tumor subtype markers. The data indicated that the EC subtype extensively expressed pan-epithelial markers, including AE1/3, CK5/6, and P63, and the SC subtype was largely positive for vimentin, while MSEC exhibited a mixed pattern of both epithelial and sarcomatoid cell markers (Fig. [115]1b, c; Supplementary Fig. [116]1a, b). These data uncovered distinct molecular features among EC, SC, and MSEC subtypes. Notably, highly proliferating Ki67-positive tumor cells and CD3e-positive lymphocytes were found across all subtypes, with no clear difference among subtypes (Supplementary Fig. [117]1c). Mutational landscapes of NPC To further investigate subtype-specific genomic features and therapeutic prognosis, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) to study the genomic landscape of NPC subtypes. A total of 2662 somatic mutations including 2306 missense mutations, 191 nonsense mutations, 82 deletions, 31 insertions, and 52 other types of mutations were detected from 88 paired tumors by overlapping results from three different callers (MuTect2, Strelka2 and LANCET), and 2148 genes were affected (Fig. [118]1d, e; Supplementary Fig. [119]2a; Supplementary Data [120]3). Validation of candidate mutations with Sanger sequencing showed that a true positive rate of 100% was achieved (Supplementary Fig. [121]2b; Supplementary Data [122]4). The somatic mutation rate in NPC is relatively low compared to other types of cancers, with the somatic mutation rate of less than one per megabase (Supplementary Fig. [123]2c), which is consistent with previous studies^[124]35–[125]37. Averagely, we identified 30.3 somatic SNVs per sample. The recurred mutations presented in Fig. [126]1d revealed the oncogenic drivers of NPC, such as TP53 (mutational frequency at 8.0%), CYLD (10.2%), KMT2C (5.7%), NOTCH2 (6.8%), NFKBIA (4.5%), FBXW7 (4.5%), ARID1A (2.3%), PTEN (2.3%), and BAP1(2.3%). The mutation frequencies identified here were comparable with those reported by several previous studies (Supplementary Table [127]2)^[128]5,[129]8–[130]11, although they were, in general, lower than that of some other cancer types^[131]35. The recurrently mutated genes aggregated into signaling pathways involving in cell cycle, NF-κB signaling, receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), chromatin remodeling, apoptosis, microtubule polymerization, mitosis regulation, DNA repair and EMT/invasion (Fig. [132]1d). Among these top mutated pathways, NF-κB signaling (CYLD (mutational frequency at 15.2% in EC), NFKBIA (8.7% in EC), TRAF3 (6.5% in EC), and RIPK2 (4.3% in EC)), mitosis regulation (WEE1 (4.3% in EC), NOTCH2 (8.7% in EC), and FBXW7 (8.7% in EC)), DNA repair (ATM (6.5% in EC) and NBN/NBS1 (4.3% in EC)), and microtubule polymerization (FMN2 (4.3% in EC)) exhibited relatively high mutational frequencies in EC subtype, which indicated that they might be the contributive factors to subtype-specific oncogenic mechanisms. Mutational signatures analysis revealed that C > T base substitutions was the predominant signatures in NPC without obvious subtype difference (Fig. [133]1f; Supplementary Fig. [134]2d). The second frequent signature in our NPC cohort was the C > A transition, which was associated with smoking exposure (Supplementary Fig. [135]2e)^[136]38. Consistent conclusion was also demonstrated by previous report^[137]39. Among top frequent COSMIC signatures in NPC, signatures 2 and 13 were related to APOBEC family, signatures 6, 15, 20, and 16 were related to DNA mismatch repair, signature 5 was of unknown aetiology, signatures 4 and 29 were due to tobacco, and signature 1 was associated with methylcytosine (Supplementary Fig. [138]2f). There was no significant difference on these NPC-related COSMIC mutational signatures among subtypes, but slightly higher APOBEC family and methylcytosine related signatures were observed in EC subtype than MSEC and SC subtypes, whereas tobacco associated signatures were higher in SC subtype than other subtypes (Supplementary Fig. [139]2g–k). Driver pathways and networks revealed by copy number variation (CNV) analysis Further investigation on somatic CNVs revealed that frequent chromosomal deletions of Chr. 3p, 9p, 14q, 16q, and amplifications of 3q, 8q, 12p, 12q, and 18q were the major features of NPC across all subtypes (Fig. [140]2a; Supplementary Fig. [141]3a), which suggested that such recurrent changes were critical genetic events leading to NPC tumorigenesis. The highest frequency of chromosome 3p deletion, locus of MST1R and BAP1, indicated that the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in this chromosome might be an early event contributing to transformation from nasopharyngeal epithelium to NPC. There were no significant differences on overall chromosomal gain and loss frequencies among EC, MSEC and SC subtypes, except EC vs. SC on chromosomal gain frequencies (Fig. [142]2b). Age also acted as an important contributive factor during NPC progression. Accumulation of chromosomal abnormality was observed with increasing age, and several unique chromosomal variations presented in patients over 50 years of age, such as chromosomal gain of Chr. 3q and losses of Chr. 16q and 19p (Supplementary Fig. [143]3b). Fig. 2. NPC cancer driver pathways and networks revealed by somatic CNVs. [144]Fig. 2 [145]Open in a new tab a Global chromosomal gains (red) and deletions (blue) revealing frequent chromosomal deletions in Chr. 3p, 9p, 14q, 16q, and amplification of Chr. 3q, 8q, 12p, 12q, 18q as major feature of NPC (n = 99 tumors). b Average chromosomal gain (red) and loss (blue) frequencies among different NPC subtypes (n = 99 tumors). Violin plots show the kernel probability density of the data at different values. Inside boxplots represent median levels, first and third percentiles. Whiskers indicate 1.5× inter-quartile range (IQR) extending from the hinges. Points above the upper and lower whiskers represent the outliers (>1.5× IQR). Statistical significance was calculated using two-sided t-test. No significant subtype-specific difference on either gain or loss was observed (p > 0.05), except EC vs. SC on chromosomal gain frequencies (p = 0.039). 55 EC, 24 MESC and 17 SC tumors were analyzed. c Top frequent CNVs identified from this cohort revealing common and subtype-specific driver mutational pathways of NPC. CNVs involving in G1-S transition, NF-κB signaling, receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), chromatin remodeling, microtubule polymerization, mitosis regulation, DNA repair, and EMT/invasion were suggested as NPC oncogenic drivers. Information of subtype, sample type, WHO subtype, gender, age of diagnosis, tumor stage, node classification, metastasis, and smoking status are shown at the bottom. 99 tumor samples were used for CNV identification. d Subtype-specific chromosomal gains (red) and deletions (blue). Chromosomal amplifications of Chr. 1q, 5p, 7p, 15q, 17q, 20q, 21q, 22q and deletions in Chr. 5q, 13q exhibited significant differences among NPC subtypes. Important subtype-specific CNVs are indicated at top and bottom region. e Subtype-specific aberrant cancer driver pathways and networks in EC and SC subtypes. Important signaling pathways, including microtubule polymerization, mitosis regulation, NF-κB signaling, and EMT/invasion, were suggested to contribute to NPC subtype specificity. Somatic CNVs in gene level were called by Sequenza and CNVkit, and only consensus results shown in both callers were retained for further analysis (Fig. [146]2c; Supplementary Fig. [147]4a, b). The detected driver mutational events aggregated into several molecular mechanisms, including defective G1-S checkpoint surveillance (CDKN2A/B, TP53, and CCND1), activated NF-κB signaling (CYLD, TRAF3, NFKBIA, NLRC5, LTBR, TNFRSF1A, RELA, NIBP, RELA, RIPK2, IKBKB, and BIRC2/3), aberrant RTK (PIK3CA, PTEN, ERBB3, KRAS, MET, BRAF, and MST1R), and chromatin remodeling (KMT2C/D, BAP1, ARID1A, and TET1) (Fig. [148]2c). The mutation frequencies of these NPC drivers were in consistent with previous studies (Supplementary Tables [149]3, [150]4)^[151]5. They were the most frequently mutated pathways across all subtypes uncovered by CNV analysis. One of the interesting findings on these top frequent mutations was that macrophage stimulating 1 receptor (MST1R) was detected with recurrent deletions in 55.6% of tumors (Fig. [152]2c). MST1R expression in wild-type and mutant samples was further confirmed by IHC staining (Supplementary Fig. [153]5a, b). MST1R was also known as c-Met-related tyrosine kinase, and normally harbored activation/gain mutations and/or overexpression in other cancer types^[154]40–[155]43. In addition to playing an oncogenic role as tyrosine kinase to enhance activation of Ras/MAPK and other signaling cascades, MST1R also plays a vital function in host defense against viral infection, including Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)^[156]6,[157]44,[158]45. Considering the high frequent loss of MST1R had no obvious subtype and age preferences (Supplementary